FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
By the editors
Summary for Policymakers of the Working Group I contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report
A note from the Climate News Network editors: we have prepared this very abbreviated version of the first instalment of the IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) to serve as an objective guide to some of the headline issues it covers. It is in no sense an evaluation of what the Summary says: the wording is that of the IPCC authors themselves, except for a few cases where we have added headings. The AR5 uses a different basis as input to models from that used in its 2007 predecessor, AR4: instead of emissions scenarios, it speaks of RCPs, representative concentration pathways. So it is not possible everywhere to make a direct comparison between AR4 and AR5, though the text does so in some cases, and at the end we provide a very short list of the two reports' conclusions on several key issues. The language of science can be complex. What follows is the IPCC scientists' language. In the following days and weeks we will be reporting in more detail on some of their findings.
In this Summary for Policymakers, the following summary terms are used to describe the available evidence: limited, medium, or robust; and for the degree of agreement: low, medium, or high. A level of confidence is expressed using five qualifiers: very low, low, medium, high, and very high, and typeset in italics, e.g., medium confidence. For a given evidence and agreement statement, different confidence levels can be assigned, but increasing levels of evidence and degrees of agreement are correlated with increasing confidence. In this Summary the following terms have been used to indicate the assessed likelihood of an outcome or a result: virtually certain 99–100% probability, very likely 90–100%, likely 66–100%, about as likely as not 33–66%, unlikely 0–33%, very unlikely 0–10%, exceptionally unlikely 0–1%. Additional terms (extremely likely: 95–100%, more likely than not >50–100%, and extremely unlikely 0–5%) may also be used when appropriate.
Observed Changes in the Climate System
Atmosphere
Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, and since the 1950s, many of the observed changes are unprecedented over decades to millennia. The atmosphere and ocean have warmed, the amounts of snow and ice have diminished, sea level has risen, and the concentrations of greenhouse gases have increased
Each of the last three decades has been successively warmer at the Earth’s surface than any preceding decade since 1850.
For the longest period when calculation of regional trends is sufficiently complete (1901–2012), almost the entire globe has experienced surface warming.
In addition to robust multi-decadal warming, global mean surface temperature exhibits substantial decadal and interannual variability. Due to natural variability, trends based on short records are very sensitive to the beginning and end dates and do not in general reflect long-term climate trends.
As one example, the rate of warming over the past 15 years, which begins with a strong El Niño, is smaller than the rate calculated since 1951.
Changes in many extreme weather and climate events have been observed since about 1950. It is very likely that the number of cold days and nights has decreased and the number of warm days and nights has increased on the global scale
Ocean
Ocean warming dominates the increase in energy stored in the climate system, accounting for more than 90% of the energy accumulated between 1971 and 2010 (high confidence ). It is virtually certain that the upper ocean (0−700 m) warmed from 1971 to 2010, and it likely warmed between the 1870s and 1971.
On a global scale, the ocean warming is largest near the surface, and the upper 75 m warmed by 0.11 [0.09 to 0.13] °C per decade over the period 1971–2010. Since AR4, instrumental biases in upper-ocean temperature records have been identified and reduced, enhancing confidence in the assessment of change.
It is likely that the ocean warmed between 700 and 2000 m from 1957 to 2009. Sufficient observations are available for the period 1992 to 2005 for a global assessment of temperature change below 2000 m. There were likely no significant observed temperature trends between 2000 and 3000 m for this period. It is likely that the ocean warmed from 3000 m to the bottom for this period, with the largest warming observed in the Southern Ocean.
More than 60% of the net energy increase in the climate system is stored in the upper ocean (0–700 m) during the relatively well-sampled 40-year period from 1971 to 2010, and about 30% is stored in the ocean below 700 m. The increase in upper ocean heat content during this time period estimated from a linear trend is likely.
Cryosphere
Over the last two decades, the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets have been losing mass, glaciers have continued to shrink almost worldwide, and Arctic sea ice and Northern Hemisphere spring snow cover have continued to decrease in extent (high confidence).
The average rate of ice loss from the Greenland ice sheet has very likely substantially increased ... over the period 1992–2001. The average rate of ice loss from the Antarctic ice sheet has likely increased ... over the period 1992–2001. There is very high confidence that these losses are mainly from the northern Antarctic Peninsula and the Amundsen Sea sector of West Antarctica.
There is high confidence that permafrost temperatures have increased in most regions since the early 1980s. Observed warming was up to 3°C in parts of Northern Alaska (early 1980s to mid-2000s) and up to 2°C in parts of the Russian European North (1971–2010). In the latter region, a considerable reduction in permafrost thickness and areal extent has been observed over the period 1975–2005 (medium confidence).
Multiple lines of evidence support very substantial Arctic warming since the mid-20th century.
Sea Level
The rate of sea level rise since the mid-19th century has been larger than the mean rate during the previous two millennia (high confidence). Over the period 1901–2010, global mean sea level rose by 0.19 [0.17 to 0.21] m.
Since the early 1970s, glacier mass loss and ocean thermal expansion from warming together explain about 75% of the observed global mean sea level rise (high confidence). Over the period 1993–2010, global mean sea level rise is, with high confidence, consistent with the sum of the observed contributions from ocean thermal expansion due to warming, from changes in glaciers, Greenland ice sheet, Antarctic ice sheet, and land water storage.
Carbon and Other Biogeochemical Cycles
The atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, and nitrous oxide have increased to levels unprecedented in at least the last 800,000 years. CO2 concentrations have increased by 40% since pre-industrial times, primarily from fossil fuel emissions and secondarily from net land use change emissions. The ocean has absorbed about 30% of the emitted anthropogenic carbon dioxide, causing ocean acidification
From 1750 to 2011, CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion and cement production have released 365 [335 to 395] GtC [gigatonnes - one gigatonne equals 1,000,000,000 metric tonnes] to the atmosphere, while deforestation and other land use change are estimated to have released 180 [100 to 260] GtC.
Of these cumulative anthropogenic CO2 emissions, 240 [230 to 250] GtC have accumulated in the atmosphere, 155 [125 to 185] GtC have been taken up by the ocean and 150 [60 to 240] GtC have accumulated in natural terrestrial ecosystems.
Drivers of Climate Change
The total natural RF [radiative forcing - the difference between the energy received by the Earth and that which it radiates back into space] from solar irradiance changes and stratospheric volcanic aerosols made only a small contribution to the net radiative forcing throughout the last century, except for brief periods after large volcanic eruptions.
Understanding the Climate System and its Recent Changes
Compared to AR4, more detailed and longer observations and improved climate models now enable the attribution of a human contribution to detected changes in more climate system components.
Human influence on the climate system is clear. This is evident from the increasing greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere, positive radiative forcing, observed warming, and understanding of the climate system.
Evaluation of Climate Models
Climate models have improved since the AR4. Models reproduce observed continental-scale surface temperature patterns and trends over many decades, including the more rapid warming since the mid-20th century and the cooling immediately following large volcanic eruptions (very high confidence).
The long-term climate model simulations show a trend in global-mean surface temperature
from 1951 to 2012 that agrees with the observed trend (very high confidence). There are, however, differences between simulated and observed trends over periods as short as 10 to 15 years (e.g., 1998 to 2012).
The observed reduction in surface warming trend over the period 1998–2012 as compared to the period 1951–2012, is due in roughly equal measure to a reduced trend in radiative forcing and a cooling contribution from internal variability, which includes a possible redistribution of heat within the ocean (medium confidence). The reduced trend in radiative forcing is primarily due to volcanic eruptions and the timing of the downward phase of the 11-year solar cycle.
Climate models now include more cloud and aerosol processes, and their interactions, than at the time of the AR4, but there remains low confidence in the representation and quantification of these processes in models.
The equilibrium climate sensitivity quantifies the response of the climate system to constant radiative forcing on multi-century time scales. It is defined as the change in global mean surface temperature at equilibrium that is caused by a doubling of the atmospheric CO2 concentration.
Equilibrium climate sensitivity is likely in the range 1.5°C to 4.5°C (high confidence), extremely unlikely less than 1°C (high confidence), and very unlikely greater than 6°C (medium confidence). The lower temperature limit of the assessed likely range is thus less than the 2°C in the AR4, but the upper limit is the same. This assessment reflects improved understanding, the extended temperature record in the atmosphere and ocean, and
new estimates of radiative forcing.
Detection and Attribution of Climate Change
Human influence has been detected in warming of the atmosphere and the ocean, in changes in the global water cycle, in reductions in snow and ice, in global mean sea level rise, and in changes in some climate extremes. This evidence for human influence has grown since AR4. It is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century.
It is extremely likely that more than half of the observed increase in global average surface temperature from 1951 to 2010 was caused by the anthropogenic increase in greenhouse gas concentrations and other anthropogenic forcings together. The best estimate of the human-induced contribution to warming is similar to the observed warming over this period.
Future Global and Regional Climate Change
Continued emissions of greenhouse gases will cause further warming and changes in all components of the climate system. Limiting climate change will require substantial and sustained reductions of greenhouse gas emissions.
The global ocean will continue to warm during the 21st century. Heat will penetrate from the surface to the deep ocean and affect ocean circulation.
It is very likely that the Arctic sea ice cover will continue to shrink and thin and that Northern Hemisphere spring snow cover will decrease during the 21st century as global mean surface temperature rises. Global glacier volume will further decrease.
Global mean sea level will continue to rise during the 21st century. Under all RCP scenarios the rate of sea level rise will very likely exceed that observed during 1971–2010 due to increased ocean warming and increased loss of mass from glaciers and ice sheets.
Sea level rise will not be uniform. By the end of the 21st century, it is very likely that sea level will rise in more than about 95% of the ocean area. About 70% of the coastlines worldwide are projected to experience sea level change within 20% of the global mean sea level change.
Climate change will affect carbon cycle processes in a way that will exacerbate the increase of CO2 in the atmosphere (high confidence). Further uptake of carbon by the ocean will increase ocean acidification.
Cumulative emissions of CO2 largely determine global mean surface warming by the late 21st century and beyond. Most aspects of climate change will persist for many centuries even if emissions of CO2 are stopped. This represents a substantial multi-century climate change commitment created by past, present and future emissions of CO2.
A large fraction of anthropogenic climate change resulting from CO2 emissions is irreversible on a multi-century to millennial time scale, except in the case of a large net removal of CO2 from the atmosphere over a sustained period.
Surface temperatures will remain approximately constant at elevated levels for many centuries after a complete cessation of net anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Due to the long time scales of heat transfer from the ocean surface to depth, ocean warming will continue for centuries. Depending on the scenario, about 15 to 40% of emitted CO2 will remain in the atmosphere longer than 1,000 years.
Sustained mass loss by ice sheets would cause larger sea level rise, and some part of the mass loss might be irreversible. There is high confidence that sustained warming greater than some threshold would lead to the near-complete loss of the Greenland ice sheet over a millennium or more, causing a global mean sea level rise of up to 7 m.
Current estimates indicate that the threshold is greater than about 1°C (low confidence) but less than about 4°C (medium confidence) global mean warming with respect to pre-industrial. Abrupt and irreversible ice loss from a potential instability of marine-based sectors of the Antarctic Ice Sheet in response to climate forcing is possible, but current evidence and understanding is insufficient to make a quantitative assessment.
Methods that aim to deliberately alter the climate system to counter climate change, termed geoengineering, have been proposed. Limited evidence precludes a comprehensive quantitative assessment of both Solar Radiation Management (SRM) and Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) and their impact on the climate system.
CDR methods have biogeochemical and technological limitations to their potential on a global scale. There is insufficient knowledge to quantify how much CO2 emissions could be partially offset by CDR on a century timescale.
Modelling indicates that SRM methods, if realizable, have the potential to substantially offset a global temperature rise, but they would also modify the global water cycle, and would not reduce ocean acidification.
If SRM were terminated for any reason, there is high confidence that global surface temperatures would rise very rapidly to values consistent with the greenhouse gas forcing. CDR and SRM methods carry side effects and long-term consequences on a global scale.
Then and Now
For comparison, here are the IPCC's projections in four key areas: from the 2013 AR5, in bold - from the 2007 AR4, in regular type
Probable temperature rise by 2100: 1.5-4°C under most scenarios - from 1.8-4°C
Sea level rise: very likely faster than between 1971 and 2010 - by 28-43 cm
Arctic summer sea ice disappears: very likely it will continue to shrink and thin - in second half of century
Increase in heat waves: very likely to occur more frequently and last longer - increase very likely
Blog Archive
-
▼
2013
(1259)
-
▼
September
(95)
- Nature: IPCC -- Despite hiatus, climate change her...
- Russians respond to Greenpeace Arctic protests wit...
- No basis for Greenpeace piracy charges by Russia, ...
- Bill Moyers and Kumi Naidoo on the Arctic and Gree...
- Russian Special Forces Storm Greenpeace Ship in th...
- Russia charges Greenpeace activists with piracy, r...
- The Economist: It's still our fault -- the IPCC c...
- Jeff Biggers, HuffPo: Beyond Clean Coal/Fracking ...
- Civil resistance to disaster capitalism: protestin...
- Lee Camp and Chris Hedges on NSA spying, inverted ...
- NBC: Michael Mann discusses the new IPCC report an...
- David Suzuki: Attacks on climate change science h...
- Real Climate: the new IPCC report
- 2 °C or not 2 °C: Insights from the latest IPCC Cl...
- Gwynne Dyer: No time to be trigger happy on climate
- Widespread Use of Neonicotinoids Poses Risks to Mo...
- Justin Gillis, NYT: U.N. Climate Panel Endorses...
- How hot will it get in my lifetime? Interactive c...
- The IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report
- IPCC opening for AR5 from Working Group 1
- Michael Mann & Dana Nuccitelli: IPCC report underl...
- Jeff Masters on Democracy Now! discusses the IPCC ...
- Jennifer Francis: The top 5 things that keep me aw...
- NASA: Noctilucent Clouds Get an Early Start
- "Climate sensitivity, sea level and atmospheric ca...
- Bloomberg News: Annual Solar Installs to Beat Win...
- New report from Citigroup: Solar energy is here to...
- Seth Borenstein, AP: What 95% certainty of warming...
- NYT: Bayou Corne, Louisiana, salt dome sink hole d...
- Fracking Victims Demand EPA Reopen Investigations ...
- Michael Mann: Climate-Change Deniers Must Stop Dis...
- Climate Denial Playbook: Marc Morano's History of ...
- David Spratt: Is climate change already dangerous?...
- "Increasing amount of Arctic Ocean deep waters in ...
- The Deep Greenland Sea Is Warming Faster than the ...
- Michael Froman, Top U.S. Trade Official, Lobbies F...
- NWF to honor Michael Mann with National Conservati...
- Springtime severe thunderstorms could increase by ...
- Brazil cools on nuclear power plans, favors wind
- Tom Steyer: stop Keystone XL and promote permanen...
- Jeremy Grantham, WSJ: the world is running out of ...
- Renewable Energy and Economic Growth Go Hand in Ha...
- David Spratt: Is climate change already dangerous?...
- Bill McKibben: The Next Step in the Divestment Fig...
- Right-wing takeover at NPR: Paul G. Haaga new boss...
- Sierra Club California statement on terrible, alte...
- Monsanto RoundUp glyphosate shown to poison soil, ...
- Flooded oil and gas wells spark fears of contamina...
- David Spratt: Is climate change already dangerous?...
- The Roller Coaster of Emotions on the Path to Buil...
- Fracking industry puppets spew obscene lies in Col...
- Brendan DeMelle: International Climate Science Coa...
- Good news for a change: no-till plus winter cover...
- Wen Stephenson: Yes, Harvard, the Climate Crisis I...
- New Management, Same Misinformation? Tell Jeff Bez...
- John Abraham: What's causing global warming? Look ...
- "Response of the wintertime Northern Hemisphere at...
- Benjamin Santer et al., “Human and natural influen...
- The Financial States of America interactive infogr...
- From rjs: working at the tar sands; Exxon illegal ...
- David Spratt: Is climate change already dangerous?
- Rare twin storms batter Mexico, 40 dead
- EDF scandal: Frackademia study by oil industry sta...
- Police arrest NoKXL great-grandmother protesting a...
- Photos: Fracking industrialization scars Ohio coun...
- Colorado floods: another example of amplified jet ...
- Activists to Risk Arrest at TransCanada HQ in Hous...
- Colorado Flooding: Deaths, Dramatic Rescues, Frack...
- James Hansen: Tar Sands and Dirty Tricks
- Summer 2013 weather extremes tied to extraordinari...
- Court rulings show judges accept climate science
- DC judge denies another effort to derail Michael M...
- Scientist Michael Mann named in top 10 influential...
- Justin Gillis, NYT: A Climate Alarm, Too Muted for...
- Top Obama aide Heather Zichal worked the Pavillion...
- Call Sacramento. Vote NO on SB4
- Graham Readfearn: The undiscerning climate bookshelf
- Graham Readfearn: Australia's Department of Defenc...
- Top Occupy Wall Street Cartoons
- URGENT: phone your CA rep to prevent industry amen...
- Tom Steyer, NexGen: Keystone XL bad economics for ...
- Daily Mail Lies! No 60% recovery in Arctic sea ice...
- Steve Horn: The Flip Side of Obama’s Keystone XL D...
- Joseph E. Stiglizt, NYT: Why Janet Yellen, Not Lar...
- "Global crop exposure to critical high temperature...
- Naomi Klein: Green groups may be more damaging th...
- Margaret Heffernan: Dare to Disagree
- "Spring snow cover extent reductions in the 2008-2...
- U.S. Becomes Largest Wood Pellet Exporter,Enviva, ...
- Rebuttal to Michael Tobis' unsubstantiated attacks...
- Why trust climate models? It’s a matter of simple ...
- Steve Horn: "Frackademia" By Law: Section 999 of t...
- MUST SEE, Peter Sinclair: No Slowdown in Global Wa...
- Dana Nuccitelli: The Pacific Ocean fills in anothe...
- Posts from August 2013
-
▼
September
(95)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment