Stephen G. Osborn et al., PNAS (May 9, 2011), Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, published online before print May 9, 2011; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100682108

Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing

1. Stephen G. Osborn^a, 
2. Avner Vengosh^b, 
3. Nathaniel R. Warner^b, and 
4. Robert B. Jackson^a,^b,^c,*

1. ^aCenter on Global Change, Nicholas School of the Environment,
2. ^bDivision of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Nicholas School of the Environment, and
3. ^cBiology Department, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708

1. Edited by William H. Schlesinger, Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, NY, and approved April 14, 2011 (received for review January 13, 2011)

Abstract

Directional drilling and hydraulic-fracturing technologies are dramatically increasing natural-gas extraction. In aquifers overlying the Marcellus and Utica shale formations of northeastern Pennsylvania and upstate New York, we document systematic evidence for methane contamination of drinking water associated with shale-gas extraction. In active gas-extraction areas (one or more gas wells within 1 km), average and maximum methane concentrations in drinking-water wells increased with proximity to the nearest gas well and were 19.2 and 64 mg CH₄ L^-1 (n = 26), a potential explosion hazard; in contrast, dissolved methane samples in neighboring nonextraction sites (no gas wells within 1 km) within similar geologic formations and hydrogeologic regimes averaged only 1.1 mg L^-1 (P < 0.05; n = 34). Average δ¹³C-CH₄ values of dissolved methane in shallow groundwater were significantly less negative for active than for nonactive sites (-37 ± 7‰ and -54 ± 11‰, respectively; P < 0.0001). These δ¹³C-CH₄ data, coupled with the ratios of methane-to-higher-chain hydrocarbons, and δ²H-CH₄ values, are consistent with deeper thermogenic methane sources such as the Marcellus and Utica shales at the active sites and matched gas geochemistry from gas wells nearby. In contrast, lower-concentration samples from shallow groundwater at nonactive sites had isotopic signatures reflecting a more biogenic or mixed biogenic/thermogenic methane source. We found no evidence for contamination of drinking-water samples with deep saline brines or fracturing fluids. We conclude that greater stewardship, data, and—possibly—regulation are needed to ensure the sustainable future of shale-gas extraction and to improve public confidence in its use.

• *Correspondence e-mail: jackson@duke.edu
• Link to free, open-access full article:  http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2011/05/02/1100682108.full.pdf