Berkeley physics professor Richard Muller's WSJ op-ed, just before the Copenhagen conference: an astonishing array of errors of fact, distortions, and evidence of mind-boggling ignorance of climate science

Dear Readers,


I can spot at least 6 errors of fact, distortions, and evidence of mind-boggling ignorance of climate science.


Please let us see what you spot.


[this also argues heavily for a periodic review of tenured professors]


Tenney


UPDATE:  oops!  Multiple headvises may be needed.

"Another option is that we could learn to live with global warming. Despite claims to the contrary, storms aren't increasing. The rate of hurricanes hitting the U.S. coast has been constant for a century, and the number of damaging tornadoes has been going down. Will Happer, a former director of research for the Department of Energy, argues that additional CO2 may have helped the agricultural revolution. And chilly Berkeley might be nicer with a few degrees warming." http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703514404574588673072577680.html