Blog Archive

Saturday, May 14, 2016

International outrage as ratbag Larry Marshall, new head of CSIRO, sacks world's leading scientist on sea-level rise John Church, in a continuation of his disastrous dismantling of Australia's premier scientific research institution

I couldn't believe this when I heard it this morning.  Maybe the outrage will be enough to get Marshall sacked or Turnbull defeated.

by Peter Hannam, Environmental Editor, The Sydney Morning Herald, May 14, 2016

For John Church, a leading authority on sea-level rise caused by global warming, there was much that was fitting – and yet callous – about being sacked at sea.

The veteran scientist was well into one of dozens of research voyages he had taken since joining CSIRO as a post doctoral student in 1979.

His vessel, the RV Investigator, was midway between Antarctica and New Zealand and steaming north on the 170 degree longitude when he received Thursday's call to tell him he was "potentially redundant." (See map below.)


John Church speaks to the media about proposed cuts to the CSIRO.
John Church speaks to the media about proposed cuts to the CSIRO. Photo: Penny Stephens


Sitting with a supporter in the ship's conference room, Dr Church was told his services were no longer needed.


"I was OK during the call but it is certainly not a nice feeling to have what you have worked for  for so many years  thrown on the scrapheap," the 64-year-old told Fairfax Media after finishing a 12-hour stint on watch.

CSIRO's RV Investigator on one of its research voyages.
CSIRO's RV Investigator on one of its research voyages. Photo: Pete Harmsen

Accelerating sea-level rises


Dr Church's achievements include developing sophisticated models linking sparse tidal gauge information around the world with satellite data to reveal how much sea levels are rising.

The current mission is retracing previous journeys along the 170 W longitude line to measure precisely how key parameters such as temperature, salinity and acidity are changing.

No thought bubble: Deploying weather balloons from RV Investigator.
No thought bubble: Deploying weather balloons from RV InvestigatorPhoto: Stewart Wilde
As Dr Church notes, including in a Nature paper published last month, sea-level increases are accelerating as a warming planet melts glaciers and swells oceans.

From increases of a few tenths of a millimetre annually in the 1,000 years before about 1850, the rate jumped 1.7 mm on average in the 20th century. Since 1993, the rise has quickened to about 3 mm a year, he says. [It's now 3.4 mm/yr.]

Despite this trend, CSIRO will slash about half the climate staff – about 70 scientists  in its Oceans & Atmosphere division. New hires will be made in climate adaptation and mitigation, the agency promises but numbers cited so far are much smaller.

As with other CSIRO staff, Dr Church will get a chance to save his job. The sole scientist on board to be told of a pending redundancy, he was granted until June 16 – or three weeks after the voyage ends in Wellington, New Zealand – to argue his case.

Letter of support


Scientists from leading research agencies, such as NASA of the US and France's CNES, have called for Dr Church's group to be retained.

In a letter sent to Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and Science Minister Christopher Pyne obtained by Fairfax Media, the scientists said the team was key for global efforts to collect and analyse climate change processes.

 "Breaking up the long-term research program of this world-famous CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere unit is a catastrophic short-sighted management decision,"  the letter said.

"In addition to the detrimental effect on research and accuracy of predictions for the Australian region, this decision will also impact on the international collaboration programmes, built up progressively over the last 20 years."

Fairfax Media sought comment from Minister Pyne, and the PM's office.

Kim, Carr, Labor's shadow science minister, said "the actions of the CSIRO will only see Australia's best and brightest leave our shores for other countries who are in demand for their talent and expertise."

"Malcolm Turnbull says he wants to create an ideas boom, but all he is creating is the largest brain drain in Australia's history."

Greens Senator Peter Whish-Wilson said CSIRO executives had shown "monumental disrespect" to Dr Church by effectively issuing him his redundancy notice while at sea.

"John Church won the CSIRO Medal for Research Achievement in 2006 and is the world leader in sea-level rise research," Senator Whish-Wilson said.

"If CSIRO aren't holding onto John, then they aren't serious about continuing to engage in sea-level rise and I urge the board of CSIRO to stop this process immediately."

A CSIRO spokesman said it would not comment on discussions with staff: "All of the talks and negotiations at present have the same goal of ensuring the excellent science and the long-term future of CSIRO is maintained."


'Inconceivable to the world'


Rosemary Morrow, one of the letter's authors, said CSIRO's undermining of its oceans expertise "is just inconceivable to the rest of the world. Especially for a country at the crossroads of so many evolving climate modes  of droughts and driving rains."

Dr Morrow added a personal touch, saying Dr Church had been the ideal mentor when she studied in Hobart.

"John was a great PhD supervisor  interested, curious, with a wide oceanographic knowledge and a patient teacher," she said. "I was very lucky to have him…it was a very motivating start to my professional life."

Andy Pitman, head of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science based at the University of NSW, said Dr Church was "the world's premier scientist" in sea-level research.

"Sacking John risks 30 years of accumulated science knowledge and the capability of transferring that knowledge to the next generation of scientists," Professor Pitman said.

"If you have a batsman averaging over 100 in cricket, it's a cause for national celebration. In science, the accumulation of runs over time provides insight and understanding that is irreplaceable," said Professor Pitman. "CSIRO has just sacked its Bradman of sea-level science."

Outspoken


Dr Church, who has been among the most outspoken scientists criticising the current round of CSIRO job cuts, was told one reason for his firing was the need to consolidate sea-level change into regional impacts.

"This is essentially a repetition of [chief executive] Larry Marshall's incomplete, naive and misleading statements, except for a focus on my area of science," he said. 

"Any reading of the literature or of the most recent [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] reports would clearly indicate that the overriding uncertainty in sea level remains the amount and distribution of sea level rise," he said.

Also mentioned was the cutback of external funds, including the Abbott government's ending of the Australian Climate Change Science Program that had been funded from 1990 until June this year.

Various clashes in recent years with management "probably did not earn me any favours, but I do not know if I was targeted because I was prepared to think for myself and to speak out," Dr Church said. "Personally, that is what I think the taxpayer expects from their scientists."

Dr Church says he will take a short break after a stressful few months finishing research and confronting "the CSIRO disaster."

But he's unlikely to be marooned for long, with fellowships and other roles in the offing.

"Sea-level rise is a long-term issue," he says, noting that without emissions reductions, the world is committed to seas rising several metres over coming centuries.

"These will become critical issues without major and urgent greenhouse gas mitigation for the many millions of people living near the coast," he says.

http://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/global-sealevel-expert-john-church-made-to-walk-the-plank-by-csiro-20160513-gov0k9.html

Friday, May 13, 2016

Climate Central: Increasing Tornado Extremes and Variability

Increasing Tornado Extremes
by Climate Central, May 11, 2016

The impact of climate change on tornadoes is still an active topic of study. Early research suggests that the warming earth will provide more energy to produce the storms that generate tornadoes, but less shear to give the necessary spin. Observations over the past few decades have yielded a couple of interesting trends. First, while there are now fewer days with tornadoes in a given year, there are more tornadoes on the days when they do occur. Second, the variability in the number of tornadoes in a month has been increasing.
2014 NOAA study examined trends in the tornado record for a possible climate change signal.
Since the early 1970s, the nationwide average annual number of days with at least one (E)F1 or stronger tornado has dropped from 150 to 100. Yet, there has been an increase in the number of days with a very high number of tornadoes. In the 1970s, the average number of days with more than 30 (E)F1 or stronger tornadoes was less than one. In the last decade, that number had jumped to 3.
Only two years in the record had more than 750 (E)F1+ tornadoes – 1973 and 2011. But even during the active year of 1973, only 2 of those days had more than 30 tornadoes that rated (E)F1 or stronger. In 2011, that number ballooned to 9. Further, 2011 had as many days with more than 30 (E)F1+ tornadoes than the entire period between 1961 and 1981. 
To look for individual state trends, Climate Central compared the average number of tornado days in each state from the first decade of the analysis to the last decade. The core of Tornado Alley (KS, NE, OK, TX) has seen the average number of days with more than one EF1+ tornado drop more than 50% during that 50-year time span.
Another trend we are seeing in the long-term tornado record is the increased variability of tornado counts from year-to-year. In the last 25% of the NOAA study period (19992013), the record for the largest number of tornadoes within a calendar month has been set 6 times. During that same period, the record for the fewest number of tornadoes within a calendar month has been set 5 times and tied twice. In effect, 13 monthly extreme records have been established or tied during the final quarter of the study period.
Not surprisingly, there are several months in which the minimum tornado record count was zero. But when the months with no tornadoes are excluded from the analysis, the study found more monthly records have been established in the most recent 15 years versus the first 45 years of the study period. Those extremes are balanced between records highs and record lows.

Increased variability of tornado occurrence in the United States," by Harold E. Brooks et al., Science 346 (2014); doi: 10.1126/science.1257460

Science, 346(6207) (17 October 2014) 349-352; doi: 10.1126/science.1257460

Increased variability of tornado occurrence in the United States

  1. Harold E. Brooks1,*
  2. Gregory W. Carbin2, and 
  3. Patrick T. Marsh2

Abstract

Whether or not climate change has had an impact on the occurrence of tornadoes in the United States has become a question of high public and scientific interest, but changes in how tornadoes are reported have made it difficult to answer it convincingly. We show that, excluding the weakest tornadoes, the mean annual number of tornadoes has remained relatively constant, but their variability of occurrence has increased since the 1970s. This is due to a decrease in the number of days per year with tornadoes combined with an increase in days with many tornadoes, leading to greater variability on annual and monthly time scales and changes in the timing of the start of the tornado season.
----------------------------------------------------------------

Tornadoes clustering in greater numbers

Will global warming cause more tornadoes? If so, that has not happened yet. Brooks et al. compiled data on the occurrence of tornadoes in the United States between 1954 and 2013 to determine if and how tornado numbers have changed. Although the authors saw no clear trend in the annual number of tornadoes, they did see more clusters of tornadoes since the 1970s. In other words, there has been a decrease in the number of days per year with tornadoes but an increase in the number of days with multiple tornadoes. Why this clustering effect has occurred is not clear.

http://science.sciencemag.org/content/346/6207/349

New climate research, May 12, 2016, compiled by Ari Jokimäki

New research, May 12, 2016

Posted by Ari Jokimäki, AGW Observer, on May 12, 2016
Some new papers from last few days:
The Super Greenhouse effect in a changing climate
http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0234.1
The dynamics of the warming hiatus over the Northern Hemisphere
http://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00382-016-3085-8
2014, The “year without a summer” in Italy: news media coverage and implications for the climate change debate
http://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10668-016-9805-8
Comparison of Climate Response to Anthropogenic Aerosol versus Greenhouse Gas Forcing: Distinct Patterns
http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0106.1
What Caused the Recent “Warm Arctic, Cold Continents” Trend Pattern in Winter Temperatures?
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016GL069024/abstract
An ongoing shift in Pacific Ocean sea level
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016JC011815/abstract
Quantifying atmospheric methane emissions from oil and natural gas production in the Bakken shale region of North Dakota
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015JD024631/abstract
Methane fluxes from the sea to the atmosphere across the Siberian shelf seas
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016GL068977/abstract
Decadal trends in air-sea CO2 exchange in the Ross Sea (Antarctica)
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016GL069071/abstract
Evidence of recent changes in the ice regime of lakes in the Canadian High Arctic from spaceborne satellite observations (open access)
http://www.the-cryosphere.net/10/941/2016/
Voltinism and resilience to climate-induced phenological mismatch
http://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10584-016-1691-4
Climate regulates alpine lake ice cover phenology and aquatic ecosystem structure
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016GL069036/abstract
Phenology and species determine growing-season albedo increase at the altitudinal limit of shrub growth in the sub-Arctic
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.13297/abstract
Larval connectivity across temperature gradients, and its potential effect on heat tolerance in coral populations
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.13347/abstract
Regional atmospheric cooling and wetting effect of permafrost thaw-induced boreal forest loss
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.13348/abstract
Relative Roles of Anthropogenic Aerosols and Greenhouse Gases in Land and Oceanic Monsoon Changes during Past 156 years in CMIP5 Models
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016GL069282/abstract
Early Summer Response of the East Asian Summer Monsoon to Atmospheric CO2 Forcing and Subsequent Sea Surface Warming
http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0649.1
The main characteristics of atmospheric circulation over East-Central Europe from 1871 to 2010
http://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00703-016-0455-z
A climatology of clouds in marine cold air outbreaks in both hemispheres
http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0783.1
Thermohaline Instability and the Formation of Glacial North Atlantic Super Polynyas at the Onset of Dansgaard-Oeschger Warming Events
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016GL068891/abstract
Ice core reconstruction of sea ice change in the Amundsen-Ross Seas since 1702 AD
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016GL068130/abstract
Spatial climate dynamics in the Iberian Peninsula since 15 000 yr BP (open access)
http://www.clim-past.net/12/1137/2016/
The impact of Southern Ocean residual upwelling on atmospheric CO2 on centennial and millennial timescales
http://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00382-016-3163-y
A review of potential physical impacts on harbours in the Mediterranean Sea under climate change
http://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10113-016-0972-9
The energy requirements of a developed world
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082616301892
Nuclear and intermittent renewables: Two compatible supply options? The case of the French power mix
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421516302063
Connecting Climate Information Producers and Users: Boundary Organization, Knowledge Networks, and Information Brokers at Caribbean Climate Outlook Forums
http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/WCAS-D-15-0076.1
Weather Effects on Social Movements: Evidence from Washington D.C. and New York City, 1960-1995
http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/WCAS-D-15-0072.1

Thursday, May 12, 2016

Results of Glyphosate Pee Test Are in ‘And It’s Not Good News’

by Lorraine Chow, EcoWatch, May 12, 2016
Last month, Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) volunteered to take a urine test to see if glyphosate—the cancer-linked weedkiller—is in their system. Forty-eight MEPs from 13 different European Union countries participated in the test, and now the results are in.
According to ELISA test results from the accredited Biocheck Laboratory in Germany: “All participants excreted glyphosate by urine.”
The experiment was spearheaded by the Green Party in the European Parliament, which wants a ban on the controversial herbicide in the European Union.
The group noted in a press release of their so-called “#MEPee” test:
On average, the MEPs had 1.7 micrograms/liter of glyphosate in their urine, 17 times higher than the European drinking water norm (0.1 microgram/litre). This means that everyone we tested was way above the limit for residues of pesticides in drinking water.
Of the 48 participants, EU-parliament members from Belgium, France and Germany made up more than 80 percent of the whole investigated participants. The test showed that EU-parliament members from Lithuania, Spain and Croatia had the highest concentrations of glyphosate. The lowest concentrations were in the urines of participants of from Italy, Finland and Ireland.
“Nevertheless all investigated EU-parliament members were glyphosate contaminated. This will show glyphosate is also in the food chain of members of the EU-parliament,” the report states.
Glyphosate, which the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) declared a possible carcinogen last March, is the main ingredient in Monsanto’s widely used weedkiller, Roundup. It is also found in herbicides manufactured by Syngenta and Dow.
The Greens conducted the test ahead of European Parliament’s April 13 resolution that opposed the European Union’s relicensing of glyphosate.
Despite fierce opposition from European Parliament, countries such as France, Sweden, Italy and the Netherlands, and the 1.4 million people who have signed a petition calling on an EU ban, the European Commission—the executive body of the European Union—reportedly plans to relicense glyphosate for nine years.
According to the Green Party, the European Commission’s latest proposal, which will be voted on May 19, will “plough ahead with a full-fledged approval of glyphosate’s license for nine years.”
“It considers only symbolically if at all the European Parliament’s resolution calling for a very limited scope of approval. Responsibility for the protection of operators and for multiple risks is discharged onto Member States in a non-legally binding manner,” the party said. “We are pissed off that our governments want to allow this poison for another nine years! No politician should have this in his or her body, and not a single citizen either!”
Glyphosate approval in the EU expires at the end of June. The chemical has been the subject of incredible controversy in Europe especially after the European Food Safety Authority famously rejected the IARC’s classification of glyphosate as a possible carcinogen in November.
Agri-business giant Monsanto has also vehemently denied glyphosate’s health and cancer risks and demanded a retraction of the IARC report.
EN Glyphosate
The Green Party’s MEPee test was inspired by a German study “Urinale 2015,” which sampled glyphosate concentrations in urine from more than 2,000 participants.
“The study found that the scale of the glyphosate problem is enormous, with detected concentrations in urine between five and 42 times over the maximum value of residues for drinking water in Europe,” the Green Party pointed out. “No less than 99.6 percent of all citizens who took part in this survey had higher residue levels. This means that virtually all citizens are contaminated with glyphosate.”
A number of other studies have detected glyphosate—the “most widely applied pesticide worldwide”—in feminine hygiene productseveryday food items and, yes, human bodies. A 2013 Friends of the Earth Europe study reported people in 18 European countries have traces of glyphosate in their urine.