by Scott Mandia, "Global Warming -- Man or Myth?" February 18, 2014
A few weeks ago, a journalist contacted the Climate Science Rapid Response Team
to get various opinions about whether climate scientists should take a
public position or in some sense a political position on the issue and
get involved in the debate/discussion over climate change in public
venues and through media coverage. After sending the request to several
climate experts, I also asked Paul Douglas, a meteorologist, registered
Republican, and entrepreneur, for his thoughts. With permission, I have
posted his response below:
My name is Paul Douglas. Scott Mandia suggested I drop you a quick
note in response to your recent CSRRT inquiry. I’m not a climate
scientist; I’m a Penn State meteorologist and an entrepreneur who has
launched a series of weather/technology companies over the years. I’ve
been talking about weather trends; how what I’ve been witnessing on the
weather maps since the 1990s dovetails with what climate models have
been predicting all along. I began talking about these trends on WCCO-TV
and The Star Tribune in the Twin Cities back in the late 90s, and
immediately got push-back from a minority of viewers and readers who
felt somehow threatened by the science. I still write a daily weather and climate science blog, and produce a daily 2:30 video segment on meteorology and climate science for our new national weather channel, WeatherNation TV.
I talk to 50+ organizations about weather and climate trends during a
typical year across the Upper Midwest, and still hear a fair amount of
skepticism, cynicism and outright science denial. As a meteorologist I
have an obligation to be scientifically accurate, to explain the trends
and most likely triggers as competently as possible.
Communication,
especially of complex scientific issues, is always challenging, but I
believe we have an obligation to translate the implications of science, not only what it is – but what it means.
The implications. It would be like a heart surgeon telling a patient he
has an irregular heartbeat, and then leaving out the part of an
implantable stent and going on a statin. I’m a meteorologist, but I
haven’t renounced my citizenship. As such I speak out about issues,
trying to highlight the signal amidst the noise. And there’s an awful
lot of noise, confusion, obfuscation and (deliberate, well-funded and
orchestrated) denial out there today, because of policy implications,
and the sheer amount of money in the energy sector that’s in play.
Trillions of dollars of carbon potentially at risk.
As an entrepreneur if I don’t respect the data and see the business
world as it really is, not as I’d like it to be, I become road kill. My
venture quickly goes out of business and I have to lay off good people.
So it is with science, which, like nature, never moves in a straight
line. But I tell people the truth as I perceive it to be. The data is
the data. If we don’t react to facts on the ground and listen to
professional scientists, including climate scientists, and base policy
decisions on a careful and deliberate attempt to document observed
changes/causes using the scientific method, we’re setting ourselves up
for failure on a planetary scale.
To the heart of your question, why don’t more climate scientists
enter into the public debate? Because the debate is over. It’s the moral
and scientific equivalent of debating gravity. The experts have spoken,
and because a very small minority of stakeholders and shareholders
don’t care for the implications there is vociferous push-back from
certain special interests. I worked in television news for 35 years.
Mainstream media likes a good on-air food-fight, a protagonist and
antagonist, shouting at each other about their worldviews. It attracts
curiosity and eyeballs – it’s ultimately good for ratings. But it’s a
false equivalent, and it’s a terrible way to conduct science. We put a
handful of (paid) climate skeptics and industry lobbyists on a stage
with thousands of the world’s leading climate PhD’s, and think this is
somehow serving the public interest? It’s not. It’s creating more
confusion, more delay and more denial, as viewers and readers pick and
choose their reality as easily as reading changing channels on their TV
or grazing over their morning horoscope. I can absolutely understand why
more professionals don’t want to subject themselves to inane banter
with science-deniers.
When I talk to groups and individuals I tell them the truth: it’s
good to be skeptical. In a day and age of hackers, scams, media spin and
political lobbyists people should be skeptical – it’s a necessary
self-defense mechanism these days. And then I remind them that the most
skeptical people on the planet are scientists. Science is organized
skepticism. The fact that thousands of experts agree on not only climate
trends, but the triggers (burning of fossil fuels) is extremely
significant.
Schopenhauer once said that all truth goes through 3 stages: first it
is ridiculed, then violently opposed, then finally accepted as
self-evident. We are at the end of Stage 2. Manufactured doubt and
industry push-back is preventing us from taking the planetary actions
necessary to avoid even more disastrous climate volatility. When sea
walls go up around Manhattan and Miami, when a large western city runs
out of water or goes up in flames, when crops fail year after year
across the Midwest and cruise ships packed with curious gawkers
routinely sail across the North Pole, maybe the professional denialists
will move on to their next target.
Not sure if that answers your question – just wanted to offer up my
opinion. Let me know if there’s anything else I can do to help.
Paul Douglas
Founder, President
Media Logic Group LLC
http://profmandia.wordpress.com/2014/02/18/republican-meteorologist-entrepreneur-debating-cause-of-climate-change-is-moral-and-scientific-equivalent-of-debating-gravity/
Blog Archive
-
▼
2014
(861)
-
▼
February
(114)
- Monsanto’s Roundup Found in 75% of Air and Rain Sa...
- Texting WaPo's Jeff Bezos: "George Will Compares C...
- Jeff Biggers: FrackGate Comes to Illinois? Media B...
- Glenn Greenwald: How Covert Agents Infiltrate the ...
- Alun Hubbard on the 50- to 150-year storms hitting...
- MUST READ: The Antarctic Half of the Global Thermo...
- Evaluation of cryo-hydrologic warming as an explan...
- Does Sea Ice loss create the condition for an emer...
- Meltwater warming interior of Greenland's Ice Shee...
- Climate Change 'Very Evident,' So Let's Deal With ...
- Justin Gillis, NYT: The Flood Next Time
- Coal Industry Report On Social Cost Of Carbon Reli...
- American Petroleum Institute Kept Tabs on Enviros
- Canada’s Arctic ice caps melting rapidly since 200...
- US urges fishing ban in melting Arctic
- The Canadian Youth Climate Coalition
- Webnar about TPP from Sierra Club
- "Volcanic contribution to decadal changes in tropo...
- Santer et al., Volcanic aerosols account for some ...
- Trans-Pacific Partnership leaked summary shows U.S...
- Steve Horn: ALEC's Fracking Chemical Disclosure Bi...
- State Department Review To Emphasize Effects Of Cl...
- Arctic ‘is set to reach 13 °C by 2100′
- Rising sea levels threaten Los Angeles
- UK storms 'have changed coastline forever' -- 6,00...
- Amplifying feedbacks and the Arctic Heat Scream: S...
- An El Niño coming in 2014?
- Peter Wadhams, Hugh Hunt, Martin Rees (Astronomer ...
- Jennifer Francis and Kevin Trenberth interviewed t...
- Jeff Biggers: Illinois Residents Stand Up to Peabo...
- It's Been 29 Years Since A Colder-Than-Average Mon...
- Michael Mann: The [Canadian] War On Science [much ...
- Scurvy Story: Why You Should Believe 97% Of Climat...
- Bee colony collapse viruses spreading to bumblebees
- Graham Readfearn: Climate Change Denier Roy Spence...
- Seth Borenstein, AP: World had 4th warmest January...
- Opponents Offer Fierce Resistance to Tar Sands, En...
- Climate change is a far greater threat to the worl...
- Global warming is now a weapon of mass destruction
- MUST SEE VIDEO: George Monbiot narrates How Wolves...
- The "Ukraine Situation" Explained In One Map
- Sen Whitehouse and Rep. Waxman write McCain and Ne...
- Roy Spencer suffers mental break -- calls consensu...
- John Abraham: Accounting for global warming requir...
- Michael Mann refutes John Christy and Roy Spencer'...
- Climate, Trees, and Legacy: 01 - Introduction; by ...
- ESA: Arctic lakes show climate on thin ice
- John Christy climate lies rebutted by John Abraham
- Observational determination of albedo decrease cau...
- By The Time Natural Gas Has A Net Climate Benefit ...
- Americans support actions to limit warming, suppor...
- Debating climate science is the "moral and scienti...
- Laugh or cry "While England drowns, and Australia ...
- More Heat Is Going Into The Ocean. Really
- "Arctic amplification dominated by temperature fee...
- Bill Nye's failure to communicate urgency on Meet ...
- Plan Shows Regulatory Agency and Fracking Industry...
- Climate change is an issue of national security, w...
- Climate-change denier Lord Lawson is an expert – h...
- Arctic Autumns On Track To Warm A Staggering 23 °F...
- ‘Megaloads’ Of Tar Sands Equipment Face Legal Chal...
- A Weird Winter of Extremes
- On Climate, Obama's Hands Are Far From Tied
- Climate scientist Ralph Keeling Makes Crowdfunding...
- Oil-corrupted Harper government makes moves to sil...
- Coastal flooding ‘may cost $100,000 billion a year...
- "Future Australian severe thunderstorm environment...
- Oceans warmed at a rate of 12 Hiroshima bombs per ...
- NASA: Global Climate Change News
- Tamino: Making Stuff Up about Sea Level Rise
- WORTH WATCHING: Abrupt Climate Change -- Expecting...
- Lord Stern: UK storms and floods show climate chan...
- Record warmth in Siberia and Brazil and cold in U....
- Feds approve more fracking off California coast
- Satellite animation of January 29 to February 10, ...
- Global warming pause/hiatus never existed -- we're...
- MUST SEE VIDEO: Prof. England explains trade winds...
- Worst-case dollar cost of a few feet of rising sea...
- Environmental Defense Center investigation shows f...
- 3 reasons why David Cameron must get rid of Owen P...
- National media blackout of Saturday's HUGE Moral M...
- >75% chance of El Nino this year: El Niño may mak...
- Divest Harvard Takes Out Full-Page Advertisement I...
- Michael Mann: Global Warming Speed Bump? The Answ...
- Researchers confirm: Warmer Pacific Ocean has incr...
- The Koch brothers' Kochtopulos web of secret donor...
- Senator Sheldon Whitehouse -- this is one of his a...
- Thom Hartmann on the Keystone XL
- Oglala Sioux Vow to Stop Keystone XL on the Ground...
- U.S. Keystone XL report relied heavily on Alberta ...
- Water Samples Show Disturbing Levels of Heavy Meta...
- How Will John Kerry Handle His 'Colin Powell Moment?'
- Keystone XL's Northern Leg: A Fracked Oil Pipeline...
- Dramatic thinning of Arctic lake ice cuts winter i...
- Oxford, UK, breaks 247-year rainfall record
- I. Joughin et al., Further summer speedup of Jakob...
- A-Team's comment on Neven's blog showing topograph...
- Greenland's Jakobshavn Isbræ outflowing 4 times fa...
- Marc Morano shows his true colors in 'debate' with...
- Frequency of cyclones hitting Australia on the dec...
-
▼
February
(114)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment