Blog Archive

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Human activity altering rainfall patterns

Human activity altering rainfall patterns

by Caroline Alphonso, Toronto Globe and Mail,

Human activity is altering the world's precipitation patterns, bringing more rainfall to Canada, Northern Europe and Russia and drier weather to tropical and subtropical areas north of the equator, according to the first major international study that examines these changes over the past century.

Global warming has been blamed for higher temperatures and warmer oceans. But this is the first research paper that makes a link to rainfall patterns, with widespread implications for how people will adapt now that they've messed with Mother Nature.

"It's the first time that we've detected in precipitation data a clear imprint of human influence on the climate system," Francis Zwiers, one of the lead authors of the study and director of the climate research division at Environment Canada, said in an interview Monday.

"Temperature changes we can cope with. But water changes are much more difficult to cope with. That will have economic impacts, and impacts on food production, and could ultimately displace populations."

The study, to appear Thursday in the science journal Nature, comes as record rainfalls wreak havoc in Britain and force thousands from their homes.

The global-warming models that scientists developed to forecast climates have predicted that one effect of a warmer world would be a shift in precipitation patterns. Current observations, the study found, confirm what the models predicted.

Dr. Zwiers and his colleagues gathered global rainfall data for about 80 years, starting in 1925, and then compared it to 14 complex computer climate models.

Natural factors, such as volcanic activity, contributed to changes in precipitation patterns. But nature's work pales in comparison to what humans have done, in the form of steady increases in greenhouse gases and sulphate aerosols produced by burning fossil fuels, the study found.

Dr. Zwiers, one of Canada's most respected thinkers on global warming, explained this human activity is causing a stronger water cycle, moving more water vapour away from the warmest parts of the planet and pushing it toward the poles. This is what is making wet areas wetter, and dry areas drier.

Furthermore, higher use of fossil fuels in the Northern Hemisphere appears to be nudging the central rain band off the equator and driving it farther south, he said.

The study found that human-induced climate change has caused most of the precipitation increases in mid-latitude areas, including Canada, as well as south of the equator. Global warming has also resulted in drier conditions just north of the equator, including Mexico, Central America and northern Africa.

One of the ironies for Canada is that while there is more overall precipitation through the year, future projections show that the summers will be particularly dry for the southern Prairies, Dr. Zwiers said. That means residents will have to spend more on irrigation or switching crops.

Gordon McBean, a professor at the University of Western Ontario and the former assistant deputy minister of Meteorological Service of Canada, said the study is proof that global warming is not only about changing temperatures.

"The reality is that the climate is changing. It's not just warming, it's getting wetter in certain places and unfortunately also drier in other places," he said.

Dr. McBean said scientists are arming individuals and governments with information to make regulatory changes and plan development.

"We need strategies both within Canada and … working globally on making informed choice. The scientific community is providing information which individuals, governments at all levels need to factor into their choices," he said.

Dr. Zwiers said the results from this study have given climate scientists increased confidence in their ability to predict changes in precipitation patterns.

Link to article: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/technology/science/human-activity-altering-rainfall-patterns/article772392/

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Joseph Romm: Shame on the New York Times for running ExxonMobil’s greenwashing ad once again — they can’t plead ignorance this time, only greed

Shame on the New York Times for running ExxonMobil’s greenwashing ad once again — they can’t plead ignorance this time, only greed

by Joseph Romm, Climate Progress, June 23rd, 2009

If I may paraphrase Sir Thomas More in the masterful A Man for All Seasons:

It profits a man nothing to give his soul for the world. But for ExxonMobil?

The NYT apparently thinks that the way to preserve its declining fortunes is by selling (what’s left of) its soul to ExxonMobil. As you can see here (clearer picture here, at least through today), the NYT is once again running an ad that its senior staff must know is false and misleading.

I debunked the ad here: The New York Times sells its integrity to ExxonMobil with front-page ad that falsely asserts “Today’s car has 95% fewer emissions than a car from 1970.” I know some at the NYT read CP and that emails have been sent to top reporters.

Also, the story has since been picked up by Media Matters (”ExxonMobil Exaggerates Emissions Reductions In NYT Ad“) and Fast Company (”Exxon’s Brazen Greenwashing, on the Front Page of The New York Times“), among others.

Ironically — or perhaps intentionally — ExxonMobil seems to be running this ad on Tuesdays, which is when the NYT runs “Science Times.”

Paper of Record, R.I.P.

Maybe it’s a waste of time, but please email the public editor at public@nytimes.com to explain you are “concerned about the paper’s journalistic integrity.”

Link to blog: http://climateprogress.org/2009/06/23/new-york-times-exxonmobils-dishonest-ad-once-again-they-cant-plead-ignorance-this-time-only-greed/

Kingsnorth observers physically assaulted by police officers, thrown into a women's prison for 4 days on false charges

The video is just incredible -- woman asks officer for his badge number which is not being displayed.

She gets throttled around the neck, her arm twisted behind her back, her neck pinched, a full-body restraint put on her, thrown in jail, not allowed to see her lawyer, spends 4 days in a women's prison, all charges later dropped.

She made no aggressive moves at any time, never raised her voice, was not disrespectful, had a full legal right to ask the officer his badge number, and at no time did she resist the arrest in any way (so they put on a full-body restraint).

The photographer, also female, was treated likewise, with an officer even standing on her foot despite her requests to get off her foot.




• Women arrested for challenging officer with no badge number
• Footage shows arresting officers binding Fit Watch pair's feet
• IPCC to receive video as concerns grow over police tactics

Watch the video of the protesters' arrest Link to this video

Two female protesters who challenged police officers for not displaying their badge numbers were bundled to the ground, arrested and held in prison for four days, according to an official complaint lodged today.

The incident was caught on camera, and footage shows officers standing on the women's feet and applying pressure to their necks immediately after the women attempted to photograph a fellow officer who had refused to give his badge number.

The images are likely to fuel concern over the policing of protests, which is already subject to a review by the national police inspectorate and two parliamentary inquiries after the G20 demonstrations and the death of Ian Tomlinson.

Val Swain, 43, and Emily Apple, 33, both mothers with young children, believe they were deliberately targeted for arrest at last year's climate camp demonstration in Kent because they campaign for Fit Watch, a protest group that opposes police surveillance at demonstrations.

The pair were remanded to a women's prison for four days and released only after the demonstration against the Kingsnorth power station had finished. They believe their treatment is symptomatic of the increasingly aggressive approach taken by police at political demonstrations.

Their arrests were captured on police surveillance footage obtained by the Guardian and submitted today to the Independent Police Complaints Commission.

Fit Watch activists are opposed to police forward intelligence teams (Fits), the mobile surveillance units that monitor campaigners at demonstrations and meetings. Campaigners affiliated to the group film surveillance officers in action and upload their details to a website.

They also use banners and placards to block the view of police surveillance cameras, which they claim are used to harass and intimidate protesters and gather information for police databases.

The women were quickly identified as members of the group when they appeared at the camp on 8 August last year.

The footage shows them standing near officers from West Yorkshire police, at least four of whom were not showing their badge numbers. A police surveillance unit began filming their interactions with the officers and captured the moment that Apple engaged an officer who was refusing to divulge his badge number.

After the officer's repeated refusals, Apple asked Swain to photograph him. "I'd like a picture of this officer so I can make a complaint," she said. "It's West Yorkshire police – no number."

Moments later, Swain and Apple were wrestled to the ground and placed in stress positions. They were told had been arrested on assault and obstruction charges.

During her arrest, Swain was wrapped with restraint belts before being carried into a police van. An officer placed his hand around Apple's neck, apparently lifting her head for the police surveillance cameras.

A third Fit Watch campaigner, Geoff Cornock, 52, was also arrested and bailed the following day. Charges were later dropped against all three, whose joint complaint to the IPCC alleges that they were unlawfully arrested and detained.

In a statement, Kent police said it recognised people had made complaints but could not comment on individual cases as there was a judicial review under way.

Link to article: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/jun/21/kingsnorth-protester-arrests-video-complaint

U.K. FIT Police arrest two female observers for asking for badge numbers, use excessive force on unresisting observers at Kingsnorth

Police are turning activism into a crime

Video footage showing the arrest of women who asked police for their for their badge numbers at the Kingsnorth climate camp last year exposes the police as disgracefully heavy-handed and repressive

by George Monbiot, The Guardian, June 22, 2009

What are the police for? Ostensibly, of course, to protect the public interest. But what is the public interest? It appears to be interpreted by most forces as preserving the status quo. Anyone who seeks political change is treated as if they were an enemy of the public interest, even when they are seeking to make the world a better place.

It's a fascinating irony that the latest evidence of police abuse in the cause of preserving the status quo comes from their own surveillance footage. The two women hurt, arrested, tied up and remanded in prison for four days by the police at the Kingsnorth climate camp campaign against the obsessive filming of protesters by the police Forward Intelligence Team (Fit). Such obsessive filming produced the incriminating footage now being used by the protesters to pursue their complaint to the Independent Police Complaints Commission.

The Fit's methods appear to have been lifted from a Stasi training manual: everyone who dares to become politically active must be filmed, identified, monitored, logged, and cross-checked. By protesting you become an object of suspicion, as if protest were a crime. This is not policing of the kind you would expect in a free society.

The arrest of Val Swain and Emily Apple is the latest exposure of the disgracefully heavy-handed and repressive treatment of peaceful, harmless people who dared to question the way the police conduct themselves. It appears from the footage to have little to do enforcing the law, let alone protecting the public interest, and looks more like an attempt by the police to protect themselves from lawful public scrutiny. This sort of thing has always happened at demonstrations. But now, thanks to the police, we have the evidence we need.

Link to article: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2009/jun/22/kingsnorth-fit-police-surveillance

Bravo Hansen! Stop coal! Stop mountain top removal!

Bravo Hansen!

Help stop coal!!!

Stop permits for new coal fired power plants!

Stop mountain top removal!

Stop coal company lies!

Stop the destruction of the environment!

Bravo Hansen!

Comments from Dot Earth blog at the New York Times:

1. Arthur Smith, Selden, NY, June 23rd, 2009, 5:44 p.m.

It is not only in Iran that corrupt governance and selfish tyranny (look up Massey and Blankenship's record!) should spark protests from those most outraged. Andy, even you here make this sound like a minor event, when outrage over MTR has been building for years. You care about schools in quake zones - so why no mention here of the school where the protesters gathered, threatened by the surrounding mines and waste accumulation? Why no mention of the report Joe Romm covered just a couple of days ago - Coal mining costs Appalachians five times more in early deaths than it provides in economic benefits?

Bravo to Hansen and those with him!

3. Chris Colose, New York, June 23rd, 2009, 7:21 p.m.

There is no need for Hansen to lay back and just be a "scientist." The science has convinced him any many others that action must be done to combat climate change, a conclusion also emphasized by the recent Copenhagen synthesis report which clearly stated that "Inaction is Inexcusable." As a leading authority in climate change science, Hansen probably has a responsibility to communicate this message in the public domain given how relevant it is to society and the public welfare. What Hansen is doing is comparable to many other peaceful demosntrations which have had large impacts on society.

7. Robert Brulle, Philadelphia PA, June 23rd, 2009, 8:42 p.m.

Finally, the sustainability movement has taken a step toward true political effectiveness. Instead of clever advertising campaigns that have proven to be ineffectual, Hansen recognizes that nonviolent civil disobedience can have a real impact. The social movement literature shows that under the right circumstances, this type of action can have a large impact.

Robert J. Brulle
Drexel University

13. Laurie Dougherty, Brookline, MA, June 23rd, 2009, 9:42 p.m.

Yes, Bravo, Jim Hansen. The extraction of coal is destructive; the burning of coal is destructive. There is no such thing as clean coal.

I agree that the Waxman-Markey bill has been weakened, and it's very frustrating that there is so much resistance in Congress to taking strong action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but I don't agree with Dr. Hansen that the bill should fail. If it fails to pass, the political momentum would be on the side of those who want to do nothing about climate change and that would give a signal to the world that the US intends to keep on doing nothing. Legislation in place can be improved on as time goes on, but right now I don't know where the support would come from in Congress to produce a drastically better bill from scratch.

If the action Dr. Hansen and his group of activists took today can galvanize more activism and focus public attention, that may do more to build pressure for better legislation than trying to to stop the one chance we have to take a step forward in Congress right now.

This article gives a fuller account of the action including a description of the precarious location of the Marsh Fork Elementary School where the group held its rally before trying to present a set of demands to Massey:
"Marsh Fork Elementary has become infamous for its location: Its children play within 100 yards of one coal silo – soon to be two after a recent state Supreme Court ruling – and sit in classrooms downslope from a coal sludge impoundment holding up to 2.8 billions gallons of toxic liquid behind a dam. Massey's mountaintop mining site and its blasting are nearby, raising fears about the safety of the dam. If the dam broke, the school and its students would be directly in harm's way. "

I second Arthur Smith's question to Andy in Comment #1 about why there was no mention of the school. Andy also failed to mention that many if not most of the demonstrators were not celebrities but were local activists. And also, as well as the climate bill the issue of Mountain-top Removal is also on the Congressional agenda this week: "The issue of mountaintop mining will be in the news again on Thursday when a subcommittee of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee holds Congress's first hearing on the issue in years. The subcommittee chairman, Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Md), is sponsoring legislation that would outlaw mountaintop mining to protect Appalachia's streams."

http://solveclimate.com...

There is no such thing as clean coal.


14. Susan Anderson, Boston, June 23rd, 2009, 10:31 p.m.

I recently read a comparison between the reaction to the shoe bomber and to mountaintop removal coal mining. It pointed out that the reaction to the former, despite no deaths and the impractical and unlikely nature of repetition, has cost billions along with considerable logistical and personal discomfort.

Mountaintop coal mining, OTOH, has harmed many many people and destroyed massive environments, and the cost to the environment has yet to be counted.

How about some political momentum behind doing what's right.

The costs here are immediate and coal's contribution to climate change due to global warming need not even be factored in to see what's wrong with the procedure.

Whose life matters? This should be a no-brainer.


15. Danny Bloom, Cyberspace, June 23rd, 2009, 10:31 p.m.

This is important. This is good. Long Live Dr Hansen. We need more people willing to cross the line and stand up for the future of humankind. We care. Many of us care. Do it.

A Speech to the Class of 2099 about "tightening the noose around coal," based on the words of Dr Jesse Ausbel and Dr Hansen.

http://tufts2099.blogspot.com


BRAVO HANSEN!!!!

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

NASA's James Hansen, 28 Activists Arrested Protesting Mountaintop Mining

NASA's James Hansen, 28 Activists Arrested Protesting Mountaintop Mining

NASA's chief climate scientist James Hansen put it all on the line today to call attention to the devastation of mountaintop mining, getting arrested along with actress Daryl Hannah, Rainforest Action Network Director Mike Brune and 26 other activists in a protest at West Virginia's Coal River Valley.

The group had led a rally at the Marsh Fork Elementary School, in the shadow of a coal silo, then marched 300 yards to a mountaintop mining site run by coal giant Massey Energy.

“I am not a politician; I am a scientist and a citizen,” Hansen said from the rally. “Politicians may have to advocate for halfway measures if they choose. But it is our responsibility to make sure our representatives feel the full force of citizens who speak for what is right, not what is politically expedient. Mountaintop removal, providing only a small fraction of our energy, should be abolished.”

Marsh Fork Elementary has become infamous for its location: Its children play within 100 yards of one coal silo – soon to be two after a recent state Supreme Court ruling – and sit in classrooms downslope from a coal sludge impoundment holding up to 2.8 billions gallons of toxic liquid behind a dam. Massey's mountaintop mining site and its blasting are nearby, raising fears about the safety of the dam. If the dam broke, the school and its students would be directly in harm's way.

When Hansen and the other protesters headed for the mining site this afternoon, Massey had several of its coal miners and their families waiting, the Charleston Gazette reports. Twenty-nine protesters, including 94-year-old former U.S. Rep Ken Hechler (below), were book on misdemeanor charges of obstruction and impeding traffic, RAN spokeswoman Nell Greenberg said.

Hechler and other Appalachia advocates want an end to the practice of blowing the tops of mountains and stripping out the coal. Mining companies typically push the debris from blasting into the adjacent valleys, where the minerals contaminate streams and water supplies.

The Obama administration earlier this month promised closer oversight of mining practices but stopped short of ending mountaintop removal.

In an essay published yesterday, Hansen described the administration's response as "a sad political bargain that will never get us the change we need on mountaintop removal, coal or the climate."

"We must make clear to Congress, to the EPA, and to the Obama administration that we the people want mountaintop removal abolished and we want a move toward a rapid phase-out of coal emissions now," Hansen wrote.

"The time for half measures and caving in to polluting industries is over. It is time for citizens to demand — yes, we can."

The issue of mountaintop mining will be in the news again on Thursday when a subcommittee of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee holds Congress's first hearing on the issue in years. The subcommittee chairman, Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Md), is sponsoring legislation that would outlaw mountaintop mining to protect Appalachia's streams.

(Photos: Rainforest Action Network)


See also:

Appalachia's Best Hope for Ending Mountaintop Mining

Appalachia Says 'Not Good Enough' to Obama Mountaintop Mining Plan

http://solveclimate.com/blog/20090623/nasas-james-hansen-28-activists-arrested-protesting-mountaintop-mining

G.J.M. Velders et al., PNAS, 2009, The large contribution of projected HFC emissions to future climate forcing

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,

The large contribution of projected HFC emissions to future climate forcing

Guus J. M. Velders* (Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, PO Box 303, 3720 AH Bilthoven, The Netherlands), David W. Fahey, John S. Daniel (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, U.S.A.), Mack McFarland (DuPont Fluoroproducts, Wilmington, DE 19805, U.S.A.) and Stephen O. Andersen (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Code 6202J, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460, U.S.A.)

Edited by Mark H. Thiemens, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, and approved May 14, 2009 (received for review March 13, 2009).

Abstract

The consumption and emissions of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) are projected to increase substantially in the coming decades in response to regulation of ozone depleting gases under the Montreal Protocol. The projected increases result primarily from sustained growth in demand for refrigeration, air-conditioning (AC) and insulating foam products in developing countries assuming no new regulation of HFC consumption or emissions. New HFC scenarios are presented based on current hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HCFC) consumption in leading applications, patterns of replacements of HCFCs by HFCs in developed countries, and gross domestic product (GDP) growth. Global HFC emissions significantly exceed previous estimates after 2025 with developing country emissions as much as 800% greater than in developed countries in 2050. Global HFC emissions in 2050 are equivalent to 9–19% (CO2-eq. basis) of projected global CO2 emissions in business-as-usual scenarios and contribute a radiative forcing equivalent to that from 6–13 years of CO2 emissions near 2050. This percentage increases to 28–45% compared with projected CO2 emissions in a 450-ppm CO2 stabilization scenario. In a hypothetical scenario based on a global cap followed by 4% annual reductions in consumption, HFC radiative forcing is shown to peak and begin to decline before 2050.

*Correspondence, e-mail: guus.velders@pbl.nl

Link to article: http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2009/06/19/0902817106.abstract

Patagonian glaciers of Chile and Argentina are losing ice mass at higher altitudes at much faster rates

CHILEAN GLACIERS MELTING AT UNPRECEDENTED RATES




by Natalie Muller, Santiago Times, 23 June 2009

NASA Scientists Reveal Patagonia Glaciers Are Losing Ice Mass In Higher Zones

The latest research expedition to the Southern Patagonia Ice Field revealed that alpine glaciers in the Chilean and Argentine Andes are disappearing at much faster rates than previously anticipated by the scientific community.
glaciar_grey_chile
Grey's Glacier meets Lake Grey in Patagonia's Torres del Paine National Park.
Photo courtesy of Flickr, bigeoino
A preliminary analysis by a team of scientists from NASA and Chile’s Valdivia-based Center of Scientific Studies (CECS), which commenced an expedition to the Ice Field in October 2008, sheds light on the alarming speed at which the glaciers are depleting.

The scientists discovered that the masses of ice in the Patagonia are melting in larger proportions and in much higher alpine zones than in any other part of the world, including Alaska and the Himalayas. Glacier ice accounts for around 75% of the world’s fresh water.

“The loss of ice mass in the higher zones is the really new phenomenon,” said Gino Casassa, a CECS glaciologist. “At least this is what we are seeing with the preliminary results which we have just received.”

Until recently, it was believed that glacial loss occurred from lower areas, and that snowfall on the higher sections of glaciers would compensate for loss of ice at lower altitudes.

“One hypothesis we put forward was that there could be a positive balance of ice in the high zones because of higher rates of snowfall in these areas,” said Casassa.

But with ice thinning high up and down low, too, loss in glacial mass in Patagonia is likely to be much greater than what has previously been calculated by scientists.

The new findings are also curious because they contradict some former studies.

For example, a previous study found that the Chilean glaciers Trinidad and Pio XI (the biggest glacier in the southern hemisphere outside of Antarctica) had advanced instead of receded, while the Perito Moreno glacier in the Los Glaciares National Park in southern Argentina had maintained a volume balance.

Between 1944 and 1986 glacial ice in the Southern Patagonia Ice Field was recorded as retreating at an average of 57 meters per year.

Most of Chile’s 3,500 identified glaciers can be found in the Patagonia Region. And most have experienced significant losses in volume and surface area due to climate change and are in danger of disappearing altogether.

“This loss contributes significantly to sea levels,” noted Casassa. “Between 1995 and 2000, Patagonian glaciers made up 9% of the total glacier contribution to sea levels.”

The shrinking mass of the Patagonian glaciers, especially the accelerated melting of the sections of glaciers in lower altitudes, was established by 1996 satellite studies and the more recent work of Japanese scientists and Eric Rognot from NASA in 2003.

The Southern Patagonia Ice Field has the third largest concentration of continental ice, after Antarctica and Greenland. Many of the Patagonia glaciers are protected under different National Parks, including Torres del Paine and Bernardo O’Higgins in Chile, and Los Glaciares in Argentina.

The higher temperatures associated with glacier meltdowns and climate change are largely caused by CO2 or “greenhouse gas” emissions. Chile’s failure to develop a sensible renewable energy policy has resulted in a green light to highly-polluting coal and diesel fuel energy production.

State authorities confirm that the nation’s CO2 emissions will quadruple in the next 20 years if no mitigating actions are taken.

SOURCE: EL MERCURIO
By Natalie Muller ( editor@santiagotimes.clThis e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it )

Link to article: http://www.santiagotimes.cl/santiagotimes/index.php/2009062216532/news/environmental-news/chilean-glaciers-melting-at-unprecedented-rates.html

Monday, June 22, 2009

Lovelock: Adapt, try to survive, CO2 drawdown via biochar may help

Climate change is inevitable, proceeding and even accelerating
by Tyler Hamilton, June 22, 2009

Climate change is inevitable, proceeding and even accelerating.

With those alarming words, author and theorist James Lovelock left the two dozen or so people within earshot – a mixed bag of politicians, activists, corporate types and media – feeling awkwardly helpless. They'd gathered May 26, 2009, in a small boardroom on Spadina Ave. to hear the British scientist talk about the coming impacts of climate change.

Lovelock kept his message simple: There's nothing we can do now but adapt and survive. He even confided that he wanted the subtitle of his latest book, The Vanishing Face of Gaia: A Final Warning, to read "Enjoy It While It Lasts."

His publisher, perhaps figuring that hopeful people are more likely to purchase books, objected.

All this defeatist talk didn't sit well with most in the room, including Ontario Green Party leader Frank DeJong, who directly challenged Lovelock on his assertion. Surely, said DeJong, there's something we can do. "I just can't accept what you're saying."

When pushed, Lovelock said the only way we could do something meaningful was to extract and permanently store greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, in addition to dramatically reducing our emissions. If we stopped burning fossil fuels tomorrow, he explained, it wouldn't do much. The damage is done. We've already released enough carbon over the past 100 years to push us past the point of no return.

But if we could also extract CO2 we "might" have a shot. And the approach with the most potential, said Lovelock, is to turn organic material into "biochar" and bury it. Lovelock endorsed the approach during his May 26 meeting in Toronto. "I've written before about biochar, or agrichar, or charcoal, or just plain char – it's all pretty much the same. Take biomass, such as wood or municipal organic waste, and bake it at over 300 degrees C in the absence of oxygen. The process is called pyrolysis, and what it does is lock in about 60 per cent of the carbon in the charred biomass."

The char, unlike the original biomass, can't rot and release methane into the atmosphere. It doesn't oxidize. It is chemically stable for hundreds of years, meaning the carbon is permanently sequestered. "This makes it safe to bury in the soil or in the ocean," wrote Lovelock.

It is considered a way to extract CO2 from the atmosphere because while the char doesn't release CO2, the new trees, crops and algae that grow to replace the charred biomass consume CO2. Repeat the char-and-grow process repeatedly and on a large enough scale and you've essentially created a global carbon vacuum.

Lovelock isn't alone in his enthusiasm for charcoal sequestration, to the dismay of hyper-skeptical Guardian News columnist George Monbiot, who trashed the idea in a March column. Australian biologist Tim Flannery, author of the bestselling climate-change book The Weather Makers, is an avid supporter of the approach. James Hansen, head of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies and a professor of Earth sciences at Columbia University, also sees an important role for turning biomass into charcoal as long as it's done responsibly.

Of course, it's not a silver bullet – there are no silver bullets with climate change. But if we're serious about halting and eventually lowering CO2 concentration in the atmosphere, it could prove the best way of managing organic waste from municipalities, croplands, wastewater treatment plants, and a certain amount of residues from forests.

Potentially, though more controversial, fast-growing poplar and willow trees that are planted once and can be harvested for about 20 years could become a source of biomass for char. These trees can be genetically modified to withstand heat and drought, as well as grow on depleted lands that can't be used for much – certainly not for growing food.

The problem, as with all other climate-mitigation approaches, comes with reaching scale. Can this really be done on a large enough scale to make a measurable impact? Nobody can say for sure, but Subodh Gupta, a chemical engineer at natural-gas giant EnCana Corp., says a good place to start is to turn municipal solid waste into charcoal.

Gupta presented a paper on the idea last Tuesday at the Canadian International Petroleum Conference in Calgary, calling it a "powerful concept" with "very significant potential."

Municipal solid waste makes sense for a number of reasons, he said. Thousands of municipalities across the continent have existing collection systems in place. The waste is not just free, but you get paid to take it. Also, there's no risk of running out.

His idea is to use a pyrolysis process to turn the organics (and potentially even plastics) into charcoal. The biogases released from the pyrolysis can be captured and used as fuel to run the process, eliminating the need for an external energy source.

The resulting charcoal is quite brittle and can be crushed or steamrolled to reduce its volume. It can then be safely stored in a landfill or even in bodies of water, where it will sit stable for hundreds of years without risk of rotting. It can even be scattered on topsoil to enhance nutrients of depleted lands.

In Gupta's view, this kind of charcoal sequestration is more practical and less expensive than the approach most pursued by the petroleum industry, which is the capture and underground storage of CO2 emissions from coal plants and other industrial facilities. He estimates that charcoal sequestration of municipal solid waste costs about $42 for every tonne of avoided CO2, compared to estimates as high as $150 a tonne for carbon capture and storage.

Link to article: http://www.thestar.com/sciencetech/article/654444

Tor Eldevik et al., Nature Geosci., 2009, Observed sources and variability of Nordic seas overflow

Nature Geoscience, 2, 406–410, published online 3 May 2009; doi:10.1038/ngeo518

Observed sources and variability of Nordic seas overflow

Tor Eldevik1,2,*, Jan Even Ø. Nilsen1,2, Doroteaciro Iovino1,2, K. Anders Olsson2,3, Anne Britt Sandø1,2 and Helge Drange1,2,4

Abstract

The overflows from the Nordic seas maintain the deep branch of the North Atlantic Ocean's thermohaline circulation1, 2, an important part of the global climate system3, 4. However, the source of these overflows, and of overflow variability, is debated: proposals include open-ocean convection, dense-water production on the Arctic shelves and the gradual transformation of Atlantic water as it circulates the periphery of the Nordic seas and the Arctic Ocean2, 5, 6. Here we analyse time series of observed ocean temperature and salinity between 1950 and 2005. We find that the progression of thermohaline anomalies on interannual to decadal timescales does not support a systematic response of the overflow properties to convective mixing in the Greenland Sea as has been suggested7, 8. Instead, anomalies in temperature and salinity that leave the northern seas at the Denmark Strait have travelled along the rim of the Nordic seas from inflow to overflow. Furthermore, the Faroe–Shetland Channel reflects the variability of an overturning loop within the Norwegian Sea that has not been observed previously. We thus conclude that the Atlantic water circulating in the Nordic seas is the main source for change in the overflow waters.
  1. G. C. Rieber Climate Institute, Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center, Thormøhlensgate 47, N-5006 Bergen, Norway
  2. Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Allégaten 55, N-5007 Bergen, Norway
  3. Department of Chemistry, Göteborg University, SE-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden
  4. Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen, Allégaten 70, N-5007 Bergen, Norway

*Correspondence, e-mail: tor.eldevik@nersc.no

E.J. Rohling et al., Nature Geosci., 2009, Antarctic temperature and global sea level closely coupled over the past five glacial cycles

Nature Geoscience, published online 21 June 2009; doi:10.1038/ngeo557

Antarctic temperature and global sea level closely coupled over the past five glacial cycles

E. J. Rohling1, K. Grant1, M. Bolshaw1, A. P. Roberts1, M. Siddall2,4, Ch. Hemleben3 and M. Kucera3

Abstract

Ice cores from Antarctica record temperature and atmospheric carbon dioxide variations over the past six glacial cycles1, 2. Yet concomitant records of sea-level fluctuations (needed to reveal rates and magnitudes of ice-volume change that provide context to projections for the future3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9) remain elusive. Reconstructions indicate fast rates of sea-level rise up to 5 cm/yr during glacial terminations10, and 1–2 cm/yr during interglacials11, 12 and within the past glacial cycle13. However, little is known about the total long-term sea-level rise in equilibration to warming. Here we present a sea-level record for the past 520,000 years based on stable oxygen isotope analyses of planktonic foraminifera and bulk sediments from the Red Sea. Our record reveals a strong correlation on multi-millennial timescales between global sea level and Antarctic temperature1, which is related to global temperature6, 7. On the basis of this correlation, we estimate sea level for the Middle Pliocene epoch (3.0–3.5 Myr ago)—a period with near-modern CO2 levels—at 25plusminus5 m above present, which is validated by independent sea-level data6, 14, 15, 16. Our results imply that even stabilization at today's CO2 levels may cause sea-level rise over several millennia that by far exceeds existing long-term projections3.

  1. School of Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton SO14 3ZH, U.K.
  2. Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, 61 Route 9W, P. O. Box 1000, Palisades, NY 10964-8000, U.S.A.
  3. Institute of Geosciences, University of Tübingen, Sigwartstrasse 10, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
  4. Present address: Department of Earth Science, University of Bristol, Will's Memorial Building, Queen's Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, U.K.

*Correspondence, e-mail: E.Rohling@noc.soton.ac.uk



Link to abstract: http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/vaop/ncurrent/abs/ngeo557.html

Casey Saenger et al., Nature Geosci., 2009, Surface-temperature trends and variability in the low-latitude North Atlantic since 1552

Nature Geoscience, published online 21 June 2009; doi:10.1038/ngeo552

Surface-temperature trends and variability in the low-latitude North Atlantic since 1552

Casey Saenger1, Anne L. Cohen2, Delia W. Oppo2, Robert B. Halley3 and Jessica E. Carilli4

Abstract

Sea surface temperature variability in the North Atlantic Ocean recorded since about 1850 has been ascribed to a natural multidecadal oscillation superimposed on a background warming trend1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. It has been suggested that the multidecadal variability may be a persistent feature6, 7, 8, raising the possibility that the associated climate impacts may be predictable9. However, our understanding of the multidecadal ocean variability before the instrumental record is based on interpretations of high-latitude terrestrial proxy records7, 8. Here we present an absolutely dated and annually resolved record of sea-surface temperature from the Bahamas, based on a 440-year time series of coral growth rates. The reconstruction indicates that temperatures were as warm as today from about 1552 to 1570, then cooled by about 1 °C from 1650 to 1730 before warming until the present. Our estimates of background variability suggest that much of the warming since 1900 was driven by anthropogenic forcing. Interdecadal variability with a period of 15–25 years is superimposed on most of the record, but multidecadal variability becomes significant only after 1730. We conclude that the multidecadal variability in sea-surface temperatures in the low-latitude western Atlantic Ocean may not be persistent, potentially making accurate decadal climate forecasts more difficult to achieve.

  1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Joint Program in Oceanography, Woods Hole, MA 02543, U.S.A.
  2. Department of Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543, U.S.A.
  3. US Geological Survey (retired) 13765 2600 Rd., Cedaredge, CO 81413, U.S.A.
  4. University of California San Diego, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA 92093, U.S.A.

Correspondence to: Casey Saenger1 e-mail: csaenger@mit.edu

Link to abstract: http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/vaop/ncurrent/abs/ngeo552.html

J.P. Briner, A.C. Bini & R.S. Anderson, Nature Geoscience, 2009, Rapid early Holocene retreat of a Laurentide outlet glacier through an Arctic fjord

Nature Geoscience, published online 21 June 2009; doi:10.1038/ngeo556

Rapid early Holocene retreat of a Laurentide outlet glacier through an Arctic fjord

Jason P. Briner*, Aaron C. Bini (Department of Geology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, U.S.A.) and Robert S. Anderson (INSTAAR and Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80303, U.S.A.)

Abstract

Ice-sheet behaviour is disproportionately controlled by the dynamics of outlet glaciers that terminate in the ocean1, 2. However, outlet-glacier dynamics—particularly over timescales longer than the observational record—are not well understood3, leading to uncertainties in our models of ice-sheet response to climate change. Here we use 10Be exposure ages and radiocarbon dating from the Sam Ford Fjord in the Canadian Arctic to reconstruct the retreat chronology of an outlet glacier of the Laurentide ice sheet, following the last glacial termination. We find that Sam Ford Fjord, which has a similar morphology to the troughs holding many outlet glaciers of the Greenland ice sheet, was rapidly deglaciated about 9,500 years ago, with retreat rates ranging from 5 to 58 m yr-1. The highest rates occurred in the deepest part of the fjord (900 m), whereas regions beyond the fjord mouth and up-valley of the head of the fjord experienced the lowest rates of retreat. We conclude that in such a fjord setting, there is a strong bathymetric control on the retreat of marine outlet glaciers: once the terminus of the outlet glacier retreated into deeper waters, increasing calving rates and basal sliding speeds caused the glacier to rapidly thin and retreat, stabilizing only when it reached the shallow inland head of the fjord.

*Correspondence; e-mail: jbriner@buffalo.edu

Link to abstract: http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/vaop/ncurrent/abs/ngeo556.html

Briner, Bini, Anderson: Laurentine glacier rapid retreat -- geologic instan

Ice sheets can retreat 'In a geologic instant,' study of prehistoric glacier shows

ScienceDaily, June 22, 2009 — Modern glaciers, such as those making up the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, are capable of undergoing periods of rapid shrinkage or retreat, according to new findings by paleoclimatologists at the University at Buffalo. The paper, published on June 21, 2009, in Nature Geoscience, describes fieldwork demonstrating that a prehistoric glacier in the Canadian Arctic rapidly retreated in just a few hundred years.

The proof of such rapid retreat of ice sheets provides one of the few explicit confirmations that this phenomenon occurs.

Should the same conditions recur today, which the UB scientists say is very possible, they would result in sharply rising global sea levels, which would threaten coastal populations.

"A lot of glaciers in Antarctica and Greenland are characteristic of the one we studied in the Canadian Arctic," said Jason Briner, Ph.D., assistant professor of geology in the UB College of Arts and Sciences and lead author on the paper. "Based on our findings, they, too, could retreat in a geologic instant."

The new findings will allow scientists to more accurately predict how global warming will affect ice sheets and the potential for rising sea levels in the future, by developing more robust climate and ice sheet models.

Briner said the findings are especially relevant to the Jakobshavn Isbrae, Greenland's largest and fastest moving tidewater glacier, which is retreating under conditions similar to those he studied in the Canadian Arctic.

Acting like glacial conveyor belts, tidewater glaciers are the primary mechanism for draining ice sheet interiors by delivering icebergs to the ocean.

"These 'iceberg factories' exhibit rapid fluctuations in speed and position, but predicting how quickly they will retreat as a result of global warming is very challenging," said Briner.

That uncertainty prompted the UB team to study the rates of retreat of a prehistoric tidewater glacier, of similar size and geometry to contemporary ones, as way to get a longer-term view of how fast these glaciers can literally disappear.

The researchers used a special dating tool at UB to study rock samples they extracted from a large fjord that drained the ice sheet that covered the North American Arctic during the past Ice Age.

The samples provided the researchers with climate data over a period from 20,000 years ago to about 5,000 years ago, a period when significant warming occurred.

"Even though the ice sheet retreat was ongoing throughout that whole period, the lion's share of the retreat occurred in a geologic instant -- probably within as little as a few hundred years," said Briner.

The UB research reveals that the period of rapid retreat was triggered once the glacier entered deep ocean waters, nearly a kilometer deep, Briner said.

"The deeper water makes the glacier more buoyant," he explained.

"Because the rates of retreat were so much higher in the deep fjord, versus earlier when it terminated in more shallow waters or on land, the findings suggest that contemporary tidewater glaciers in Greenland and Antarctica that are retreating into deep waters may begin to experience even faster rates of retreat than are currently being observed," said Briner.

Right now, Jakobshavn Isbrae is draining into waters that are nearly a kilometer deep, he said, which means that its current rates of retreat -- as fast as 10 kilometers in the past decade -- could continue for the next hundred years.

"If modern glaciers do this for several decades, this would rapidly raise global sea level, intercepting coastal populations and requiring vast re-engineering of levees and other mitigation systems," said Briner.

Co-authors on the paper were Aaron C. Bini, formerly a master's of science candidate in the UB Department of Geology, and Robert S. Anderson, Ph.D., in the Department of Geological Sciences at the University of Colorado, Boulder.

Briner's research was funded by the National Science Foundation.

Link to article: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090621143315.htm

Sunday, June 21, 2009

"Climate Change: Picturing the Science" by Gavin Schmidt and Joshua Wolfe

Climate Change: Picturing the Science

Book Review

Digg this! Share this on Twitter - Book Review: Climate Change: Picturing the ScienceTweet this submit to reddit Share This

Sunday, June 21, 2009, 5:58:38 a.m. PDT

Climate Change: Picturing the Science
Authors: Gavin Schmidt and Joshua Wolfe
Publisher: W. W. Norton & Co., 2009

Books on the environment in general and climate change in particular have become visual works of art over the years. The two authors teamed up to take that trend to its logical end: I asked Dr. Schmidt why the focus on pictures:

Much of the reporting in traditional media fixate on polar bears and extreme weather. We wanted a bigger picture, the intricacies and subtleties beyond those notable icons. We felt that eye catching imagery integrated with easy to read vignettes would better convey to readers of all background what our work is really all about.

The lexicon of climate change may intimidate the non-scientist, but the concepts involved are intuitive for any species on earth. Temperature, humidity, salinity, wind and rain. These and other factors can interact in surprisingly elegant and sometimes unforeseen ways. A few examples:


The documented decline of glaciers over the last century are powerful illustrations of climate change and amplification in the cyrosphere. But as the authors point out, a few glaciers, for example, along the western coast of Norway, increased slightly up until a few years ago. Climate change brings about changes in weather; in some cases that can mean more humidity which can translate to more snowfall feeding the glacier. But it also brings more extreme freeze/thaw cycles which eventually overwhelm the higher rates of snowfall along with earlier seasonal changes. This may be part of the reason the once resistant Norwegian glaciers are now retreating as well. More below the fold.

  • ::


Case in point, dramatic satellite images of the Larsen B Ice Shelf made headlines around the world when it collapsed in 2002. But the effects of climate change across the continent of Antarctica is a lot more complex and a lot less clear than most people appreciate. Antarctica appeared to be relatively unaffected by climate change until more recently. The continent is classified as a cold desert. But precipitation in the form of snowfall is expected to increase due to higher humidification. This effect could in principle delay sea level rise from melting Antarctic ice sheets. But wind currents and other factors have changed noticeably and it remains to be seen how this vast, poorly understood region will react under changing conditions humans have never witnessed.


One common critique of climate change is that if local weathermen can't accurately predict if it will rain next weekend, how can the public have faith in complex computer models that make predictions on far greater time scales? The answer is, scientists can make predictions about long-term climate, because climate and weather are not the same thing. No one can say it will snow on Christmas day wherever you are in 2050, but we do know it will get warmer in the spring and cooler in the fall because climate is forced by seasons. It should come as no surprise that it can be forced by factors like high-altitude aerosols that reflect solar radiation, or greenhouse gases that retain it. An event like the 1991 eruption of Mt. Pinatubo was a grand experiment that allowed researchers to test the accuracy of high-altitude aerosol layers vs. GHG models. Empirical observations from real world phenomena give researchers the opportunity to test models with many variables. As those models have become more sophisticated and their results confirmed, climate scientists have grown more confident in their long-range predictions.

Flammable bubbles of the potent greenhouse gas methane, once sequestered away in permafrost and sea floor, now rise to the icy surface. This is visual representation of a mostly unseen changes in the chemical and thermal properties of the Arctic ocean. Methane breaks down into other GHGs causing more warming releasing more methane. It's a powerful feedback process already underway. For decades the subtle changes were mostly noticed by a handful of scientists and indigenous people. But it's all connected and growing: those changes now threaten the seasonal blooms of plankton which form the basis of a rich food chain ultimately affecting fisheries and sea life all over the planet.

If a picture is worth a thousand words, then Schmidt and Wolfe’s new book is worth the modest asking price many times over. The number of breathtaking images and fascinating lessons that can be drawn from them exceed the scope of any review. Suffice it to say the book is well worth the price for the images alone. The illustration are clear, text does not run into or overlap them, diagrams are straightforward, and the information that goes along with the pictures is easy to follow for even a casual reader, not to mention completely apolitical. The latter is not an accident: as the title suggests, the authors chose to let the science and pictures make the case for them. In my opinion they succeed wildly.

Dr. Gavin Schmidt is a senior climate scientist at NASA Goddard Space Science Institute and a founding member of the popular blog Real Climate; Josh Wolfe is an up and coming young photographer with a longstanding interest in the natural world.

Link to book review: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/6/21/743020/-Book-Review:-Climate-Change:-Picturing-the-Science

Saturday, June 20, 2009

G. Leduc et al., Nature, 445: Moisture transport across Central America as a positive feedback on abrupt climatic changes

Nature 445, 908-911 (22 February 2007); doi:10.1038/nature05578; received 18 October 2006; accepted 4 January 2007.

Moisture transport across Central America as a positive feedback on abrupt climatic changes

Guillaume Leduc, Laurence Vidal, Kazuyo Tachikawa, Frauke Rostek, Corinne Sonzogni, Luc Beaufort and Edouard Bard (CEREGE, UMR6635, CNRS Université Paul Cézanne Aix-Marseille III, Collège de France, Europôle de l'Arbois, BP 80, 13545 Aix-en-Provence Cedex 04, France)

Abstract

Moisture transport from the Atlantic to the Pacific ocean across Central America leads to relatively high salinities in the North Atlantic Ocean1 and contributes to the formation of North Atlantic Deep Water2. This deep water formation varied strongly between Dansgaard/Oeschger interstadials and Heinrich events—millennial-scale abrupt warm and cold events, respectively, during the last glacial period3. Increases in the moisture transport across Central America have been proposed to coincide with northerly shifts of the Intertropical Convergence Zone and with Dansgaard/Oeschger interstadials, with opposite changes for Heinrich events4. Here we reconstruct sea surface salinities in the eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean over the past 90,000 years by comparing palaeotemperature estimates from alkenones and Mg/Ca ratios with foraminiferal oxygen isotope ratios that vary with both temperature and salinity. We detect millennial-scale fluctuations of sea surface salinities in the eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean of up to two to four practical salinity units. High salinities are associated with the southward migration of the tropical Atlantic Intertropical Convergence Zone, coinciding with Heinrich events and with Greenland stadials5. The amplitudes of these salinity variations are significantly larger on the Pacific side of the Panama isthmus, as inferred from a comparison of our data with a palaeoclimate record from the Caribbean basin6. We conclude that millennial-scale fluctuations of moisture transport constitute an important feedback mechanism for abrupt climate changes, modulating the North Atlantic freshwater budget and hence North Atlantic Deep Water formation.

Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to G.L. (e-mail: leduc@cerege.fr) and E.B. (e-mail: bard@cerege.fr).

Link to abstract: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v445/n7130/abs/nature05578.html

Water vapor transfer at Equator to North Atlantic now going to the Pacific side and thence to the Midwest

UPDATE:

Dear Readers,

I am not a scientist -- my bad!!!!

Dear Cassandra,

I think you misunderstood the point of the Nature paper and of the Sciencedaily report, that indeed properly and fairly relates the essential of the original article.

Guillaume

Tenney said...

Yeah, I think I did misunderstand it -- sorry.

Tenney

btw -- that darned Cassandra name has followed me around via yahoo for more than 10 years -- it has nothing to do with this blog but rather with a family financial matter in 1998.



UPDATE: Dear Readers,

I just located the abstract in Nature related to the Science Daily article below, and basically the Science Daily article draws out the wrong info. Please read the abstract in the post above this one.

Dear Readers,

This article focuses on the transfer of water vapor over the Atlantic from the equator during colder climes. Try to read the article from the perspective of hotter climes, thinking of what happens on the Pacific side of Central America. Also note that, this year, the Intertropical Convergence Zone decided not to go north as usual with the solar equator, thus dumping continuous and enormous quantities of rain on northern and northeastern Brazil, flooding some 500,000 people out of their homes. Next, have a look at the water vapor circulation animations at the links below and tell me where the water vapor from the equator is going now. Looks to be leaving the eastern Pacific south of Baja, Mexico, circles over the Midwest, then back down to the equator on the Atlantic side -- not much like the old days, is it?

http://weather.unisys.com/satellite/sat_wv_hem_loop-12.html

http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/data/east/animation/goeseastwv.html

A climate-change amplifying mechanism

ScienceDaily, March 8, 2007 — During the past 90,000 years, there were alternating hot and cold periods lasting several thousand years each which resulted in a modification of global oceanic circulation. With the help of paleoclimatic and paleo-oceanographic indicators, scientists at CEREGE1 have highlighted a feedback mechanism of ocean circulation on the climate which reinforces this heating or cooling. This mechanism relies on a close link between the circulation of the North Atlantic and the tropical hydrology of Central America. This study, published in the February 22, 2007, review edition of Nature, should allow us to better understand and therefore better predict the effects of climate change on oceanic circulation.In the past, major and rapid climatic variations which took place notably during the last glacial period (Heinrich period) disturbed ocean circulation. Climatic archives (marine and lake sediment, polar ice, stalagmites) show the close relationship existing between climatic variations and oceanic circulation. Changes in oceanic circulation in the North Atlantic have influence on a planetary level by affecting, in particular, the water cycle. These changes are accompanied by a shift in the climatic equator which separates the trade wind systems of the two hemispheres: southwards during cold events and northwards during hot ones.

Central America, a narrow continental strip which separates the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, plays a key role in this system. On the Atlantic side surface waters evaporate, which increases salinity. The water vapour is transferred by the trade winds to the Pacific where it is deposited as rain, thus lowering salinity there. This enormous transfer of water (several hundred thousand cubic meters per second) maintains a contrast in salinity between the two oceans. The surface waters of the tropical Atlantic are then transported, via the Gulf Stream, towards the high latitudes where they warm the atmosphere before plunging into the abysses in the convection zones situated in the seas of Norway, Greenland and Labrador. The deep waters formed by this process then flow into the world ocean, purging the North Atlantic of part of its excess salt.

The scientists at CEREGE1 reconstituted the variations in surface water salinity in the area where the water vapour coming from the Atlantic is deposited. To do this they worked on the measurements taken in marine sediments collected in 2002 west of the Isthmus of Panama by the French oceanographic ship, the Marion Dufresne. This study shows that the cold Heinrich periods correspond to increases in salinity in the east Pacific. This is synonymous to a decrease in the transfer of water vapour. By comparing their results to other studies done in the Atlantic sector and in South America, the scientists were able to describe a feedback mechanism which amplified the climatic disturbance. During cold periods the trade winds, loaded with humidity, migrated southwards. Unable to cross the Andes part of the rain, which would normally have lowered the salinity of the East Pacific, fell in the Amazon basin. This feedback had the effect of re-injecting rainwater into the Atlantic, thereby decreasing the ocean's salinity. This water was then transported to the higher latitudes, contributing to the weakening of deep oceanic circulation, thereby reinforcing the cooling above and around the North Atlantic.

Today, the fact that global warming could disturb the water cycle and lead to a slowing down of the North Atlantic circulation is a real subject of concern. Oceanographic data from the last 50 years suggest that hydrographic changes (temperature and salinity), as well as a lessening of the flow of water transported by certain surface and deep-sea marine currents, have already occurred in the North Atlantic. The risk of an even greater variation of oceanic circulation by the end of this century or the beginning of the next needs to be taken seriously and actively studied.

Link to article: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/02/070226131713.htm

Greenland's Ice Sheet is looking a little bumpy


Can anybody tell me what is up with the western edge of Greenland's ice sheet?

CLICK TO ENLARGE

EAST
WEST
Link to this image: http://rapidfire.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/realtime/single.php?2009171/crefl1_143.A2009171001000-2009171001500.1km.jpg

Friday, June 19, 2009

NOAA's monthly mean carbon dioxide measured at Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii, May 2009, WUWT


Graph above is of the GLOBAL monthly averages. CLICK ON GRAPH TO ENLARGE. Are we getting a methane spike?

For NOAA's monthly mean carbon dioxide measured at Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii. Link: http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/webdata/ccgg/trends/co2_trend_gl.pdf

Link below to the monthly measurements going back to the 1950s, at Mauna Loa:

ftp://ftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/ccg/co2/trends/co2_mm_mlo.txt

Link to NOAA's Mauna Loa page: http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/