Blog Archive

Sunday, September 11, 2016

tamino: Deniers: Is This Really the Hill You Want to Die On? “No global warming for 15 years” ?

by tamino, "Open Mind" blog, September 10, 2016

Of all the lies we constantly hear from deniers, one of the most common (and with them, most popular) is some variation of “no global warming for 15 years.” It started many years ago with “no global warming since 1998,” has since been revised to “no global warming since 1997” and “no global warming since 2001” and “no global warming since 2002,” has run through “no global warming for 18 years” and “no global warming for 20 years,” but now seems to have settled on “no global warming for 15 years.”
The reason it keeps changing is that whenever they decide on what to bellow about, it quickly becomes obvious it’s not true. None of their claims is true. That’s no problem for them. Doubt is their product.
They used to base such claims on Earth’s surface temperature data. But a glance at how temperature at Earth’s surface has changed will quickly dispel that notion.
It’s ridiculously obvious that in addition to the trend in temperature — the changes that persist — there are also fluctuations, changes that don’t persist. The red line in the above graph is an estimate of the trend; if we subtract it from the data we have an estimate of the fluctuations, which I’ll show here by adding a blue line to represent the year-to-year fluctuations.
To make it look like there’s no warming, they have to isolate a brief span of time, one so short that the trend doesn’t have enough time to make itself obvious, so the fluctuations are all you really see. And they have to pick a time span when the fluctuations tend downward, to cancel out the appearance of the upward trend. You might try the span from 2001 through 2014, for instance:
A close-up shows that this time span is one during which the fluctuations tended to go opposite to the trend, essentially hiding the trend:
It’s what fluctuations do. They go sometimes up, sometimes down, and when they go up then go down it can look like a downward trend, cancelling out the upward trend. But fluctuations don’t persist. That’s why those who show you a tiny time span, don’t want you to see what led up to it — or what came after.
The same claim could have been made for the period from 1980 through 1994:
A close-up shows the same:
Alas for the poor climate deniers, the last two years both set new hottest-year records and 2016 is on its way to doing it again. The result is that the record of surface temperature makes it embarrassing to tell people there’s been “no warming since…”
Another embarrassment for them is that during the very time they like to crow about “no warming,” we’ve seen such a massive decrease in Arctic sea ice:
Then there’s the amount of heat in the ocean, rather than at the surface where we live:
There’s also the level of the sea itself, which has risen because global warming has melted so much land ice and because the sea expands as it warms:
There’s also the incredible rate of the loss of Greenland ice:
And the shrinking of the world’s glaciers. And the migration of species to higher latitudes and higher elevations. And the earlier arrival of spring. And earlier snowmelt. And more wildfire burn. And earlier breakup of the ice on frozen lakes. There are so many signs, only those in denial can deny it — and those signs have been clear during the “last 15 years” just as they were before.
But there’s still a little bit of data one can twist to look like maybe, if you hide most of it and squint while looking at it in just the right way, you can make yourself believe there’s been “no global warming for 15 years.” It’s the satellite data for the temperature in the lower troposphere from the University of Alabama at Huntsville.
That’s why, when politicians whine about “no global warming” they only show you that data. Not surface temperature. Not ocean heat content or sea level. Not Greenland melting or glacier disappearance or any of the other things that show how hot it’s getting. They only show you what they can manipulate to make their case … and generally don’t even show you all of it, they have to leave out what might provide context.
But they have a problem. A big one. It’s getting more and more obvious that their “no warming for XX years” narrative is bullshit. They picked that dialogue, and it’s going to end up killing them. The day will come, soon, when not even Donald Trump will be able to weasel his way out of the reality of man-made climate change.
Deniers: you picked this hill. For you … it’s not a good choice.

Tamino's blog is made possible by readers like you; join others by donating at Peaseblossom’s Closet.


Anonymous said...

Great article, good points for the idiot crowd.

I'm voting for "let this f'n fools all die". And soon. Sooner the better. These stupid thugs are a HUGE problem for the world, so let's stop feeding them, supporting them or listening to them.

There is absolutely NO excuse whatsoever for these idiots to keep on bleating like they are. But they insist, so we should too. Insist on no audience, no food, no water, no resources, no air, nothing at all to help them ruin what remains for the rest of us who still want a future for humanity and all the other creatures on this planet.

Total boycott. Shut up the idiots and morons once and for all.

Bioneer: Tony C. Saladino said...

When we find a problem, initially it is easy to get discouraged, especially when the problem is huge, "complicated" or multi-faceted. Climate change proves to be exactly these things.However, there are people and groups, myself among them that have been quietly taking positive steps in the right direction, sequestering carbon, building soils, conserving water and enriching the planet through ecosystem recovery efforts.

The corporate welfare whores that squander all that is good and rape Mother earth need to be stopped, yes. However, without participating in the revolution that has never been televised, beating your head against some bugger's wall only leaves one with a headache of massive proportions. Boycott, Divest and Sanction the corporate entities that make their money from doing the wrong things and invest in the solutions.

The not for profit that my wife and I started has spent under 10K to transform over fourteen acres so far. We have also created hundreds of pounds of biochar, making carbon into healthy soils across Northeast Wisconsin. The waste streams we utilize to make char exist nearly everywhere on the planet and our efforts are to share our replicable process with anyone who wants to learn it. We receive no government funding and we have been walking the talk for over thirty years, just like Bernie Sanders.

Corporate welfare recipients may die on the same hill as climate deniers because the facts fly in the face of their lies. Become part of the solution and contact #TCSaladino in the twittersphere, or email: To speak in person call (nine twenty)double eight four-triple two four. Biochar classes and ECO-Tours are what we do,nothing good is ever easy, but if you love Mother Earth and take the time to heal her, the rewards are quite possibly infinite.