10 years late: New York Times puts climate change above the fold, uses wrong terminology in headline

"Challenging" implies there is a debate.  There is no debate.  The science is clear and has been for years.

"Skeptics" implies there are scientists who honestly have grounds for doubting the research. 

There are no such scientists.  There are only paid denier cranks who have no research to back up their nonsense.

Long past time for the media to stop using the word "skeptic" to describe them!

Long past time to stop quoting fossil-fuel paid Patrick Michaels, non-scientist Judith Curry, professional obfuscator Roger Pielke, Jr., and perennially wrong John Christy.

Long past time to stop giving them a platform in the name of [false] balance.