Bob Guercio: Stratospheric Cooling and Tropospheric Warming - Revised

Stratospheric Cooling and Tropospheric Warming - Revised

by Bob Guercio, Skeptical Science, December 1, 2010

Increased levels of carbon dioxide (CO₂) in the atmosphere have resulted in the warming of the troposphere and cooling of the stratosphere which is caused by two mechanisms. One mechanism involves the conversion of translational energy of motion or translational kinetic energy (KE) into Infrared radiation (IR) and the other method involves the absorption of IR energy by CO₂ in the troposphere such that it is no longer available to the stratosphere. The former dominates and will be discussed first. For simplicity, both methods will be explained by considering a model of a fictitious planet with an atmosphere consisting of CO₂ and an inert gas such as nitrogen (N₂) at pressures equivalent to those on earth. This atmosphere will have a troposphere and a stratosphere with the tropopause at 10 km. The initial concentration of CO₂ will be 100 parts per million (ppm) and will be increased to 1000 ppm. These parameters were chosen in order to generate graphs which enable the reader to easily understand the mechanisms discussed herein. Furthermore, in keeping with the concept of simplicity, the heating of the earth and atmosphere due to solar insolation will not be discussed.  A short digression into the nature of radiation and its interaction with CO₂ in the gaseous state follows.

Temperature is a measure of the energy content of matter and is indicated by the translational KE of the particles. A gas of fast particles is at a higher temperature than one of slow particles. Energy also causes CO₂ molecules to vibrate but although this vibration is related to the energy content of CO₂, it is not related to the temperature of the gaseous mixture. Molecules undergoing this vibration are in an excited state.

IR radiation contains energy and in the absence of matter, this radiation will continue to travel indefinitely. In this situation, there is no temperature because there is no matter.

The energy content of IR radiation can be indicated by its IR spectrum which is a graph of power density as a function of frequency. Climatologists use wavenumbers instead of frequencies for convenience and a wavenumber is defined as the number of cycles per centimeter. Figure 1 is such a graph where the x axis indicates the wavenumber and the y axis indicates the power per square meter per wavenumber. The area under the curve represents the total power per square meter in the radiation.

 

Figure 1. IR spectrum (no atmosphere).

The interaction of IR radiation with CO₂ is a two way street in that IR radiation can interact with unexcited CO₂ molecules and cause them to vibrate and become excited and excited CO₂  molecules can become unexcited by releasing IR radiation.

Consider now the atmosphere of our fictitious model. N₂ and CO₂ molecules are in motion and the average speed of these molecules is related to the temperature of the stratosphere. Now imagine that CO₂ molecules are injected into the atmosphere causing the concentration of CO₂ to increase. These molecules will then collide with other molecules of either N₂ or CO₂ and some of the KE of these particles will be transferred to the CO₂ resulting in excited CO₂ molecules and a lowered stratospheric temperature. All entities, including atoms and molecules, prefer the unexcited state to the excite state. Therefore, these excited CO₂ molecules will emit IR radiation which, in the rarefied stratosphere, will simply be radiated out of the stratosphere. The net result is a lower stratospheric temperature. This does not happen in the troposphere because, due to higher pressures and shorter distances between particles, any emitted radiation gets absorbed by another nearby CO₂ molecule.

In order to discuss the second and less dominant mechanism, consider Figure 1 which shows the IR spectrum from a planet with no atmosphere and Figure 2 which shows  the IR spectrums from the same planet with CO₂ levels of 100 ppm and 1000 ppm respectively. These graphs were generated from a model simulator at the website of Dr. David Archer, a professor in the Department of the Geophysical Sciences at the University of Chicago, and were edited to contain only the curves of interest to this discussion. As previously stated, these parameters were chosen in order to generate graphs which enable the reader to easily understand the mechanism discussed herein. 

The curves of Figure 2 approximately follow the intensity curve of Figure 1 except for the missing band of energy centered at 667 cm^-1. This band is called the absorption band and is so named because it represents the IR energy that is absorbed by CO₂. IR radiation of all other wavenumbers do not react with CO₂ and thus the IR intensity at these wavenumbers is the same as that of Figure 1. These wavenumbers represent the atmospheric window which is so named because the IR energy radiates through the atmosphere unaffected by the CO₂.

 

Figure 2. CO₂ IR spectrum  (100-1000 ppm). 

A comparison of the curves in Figure 2 shows that the absorption band at 1000 ppm is wider than that at 100 ppm because more energy has been absorbed from the IR radiation by the troposphere at a CO₂ concentration of 1000 ppm than at a concentration of 100 ppm. The energy that remains in the absorption band after the IR radiation has traveled through the troposphere is the only energy that is available to interact with the CO₂ of the stratosphere. At a CO₂ level of 100 ppm there is more energy available for this than at a level of 1000 ppm. Therefore, the stratosphere is cooler because of the higher level of CO₂ in the troposphere. Additionally, the troposphere has warmed because it has absorbed the energy that is no longer available to the stratosphere.

In concluding, this paper has explained the mechanisms which cause the troposphere to warm and the stratosphere to cool when the atmospheric levels of CO₂ increase. The dominant mechanism involves the conversion of the energy of motion of the particles in the atmosphere to IR radiation which escapes to space and the second method involves the absorption of IR energy by CO₂ in the troposphere such that it is no longer available to the stratosphere. Both methods act to reduce the temperature of the stratosphere.

*It is recognized that a fictitious planet as described herein is a physical impossibility. The simplicity of this model serves to explain a concept that would otherwise be more difficult using a more complex and realistic model.

                               Copyright 2010 - Robert J. Guercio

Link:  http://www.skepticalscience.com/Stratospheric-Cooling-and-Tropospheric-Warming.html