Link to article: http://www.columbia.edu/%7Ejeh1/mailings/20080324_Rampant.pdf)
BLOGGER'S NOTE: The text below is from Dr. Hansen's latest communique.
Predictably, as scientific evidence clarifies that the dangerous level of atmospheric CO2 is at hand, there are cries that it is impractical to avoid climate catastrophe. Such negativity is part of the playbook of those who stand to gain from business-as-usual. A recent report by the Scripps Howard News Service claims that I stated “we must reduce greenhouse gases by 80 percent within 12 years or it will be too late to prevent a climate catastrophe.” What nonsense.
The “Peak Oil” paper by Kharecha and Hansen has been accepted for publication in
Global Biogeochemical Cycles. The final form is available at: http://arxiv.org/pdf/0704.2782v3
In this paper we show that if emissions from coal are phased out linearly between 2020 and 2050 atmospheric CO2 will not exceed ~450 ppm, with the exact peak CO2 depending on the true amount of oil and gas reserves, about which there is some dispute. (Long-term coal use is permitted, but only with carbon capture and storage). The ~450 ppm CO2 peak also depends on the assumption that the world does not turn to unconventional fossil fuels (such as tar shale) as fossil fuels are depleted. Emissions from unconventional fossil fuels so far are negligible (mainly a small bit from tar sands), and that will always be the case if an appropriate price is placed on carbon emissions.
In our draft (http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/2008/TargetCO2_20080317.pdf) “Target CO2” paper we show that 450 ppm CO2 is far into the dangerous zone, and we recommend a goal of phasing out coal emissions by 2030 (the practical difficulty of phasing out coal emissions in 20-25 years is acknowledged and discussed at the end of the paper). This keeps peak CO2 close to 400 ppm, again with some variation depending on the magnitude of true undiscovered oil reserves.
People can help assure that maximum CO2 stays close to 400 ppm by vociferously
opposing oil drilling in environmentally sensitive regions such as the Arctic and Antarctic, on public land, in off-shore regions where states and other governments can foil the desire of oil companies to extract every last drop of oil, etc. Of course the most effective way to assure that we do not act as desperate addicts, refusing to move to the cleaner world beyond fossil fuels, tearing up the land for every last bit of fossil fuels, is via a significant and gradually rising price on carbon emissions.
The public must take the lead, because there are so many “well-oiled” officials in our governments, and not just in the United States. To summarize the present and prior discussions, important things that the public can do are:
1. Fight for a moratorium on new coal-fired power plants,
2. Oppose extraction of fossil fuels in public and environmentally sensitive regions,
3. Vote for politicians who take the Stewardship pledge
(http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/20070802_Stewardship.pdf)
-- do not vote for “well-oiled” politicians who accept funding from fossil fuel interests.
The Earth’s history shows us that we cannot put all the carbon in fossil fuels back into the air without producing a very different planet from the one to which humanity is adapted. There is still time to phase off fossil fuels, but it requires sensible policies in the public interest. This will not be easy: the special interests are pouring huge amounts of funding into disinformation campaigns.
More on this soon.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(510)
-
▼
March
(39)
- Hansen to Australian PM: stop coal plants now
- Winter worldwide warmer than normal
- Warming affects trees, streams in American West
- The Clean Energy Scam by Michael Grunwald
- Odd Crop Prices Defy Economics by Diana B. Henriques
- John Turner: Study finds 'classic global warming' ...
- "The Last Generation: How Nature Will Take Her Rev...
- Ocean-Wave Heights Rising Along East Coast
- Forecasters Focus on Strange Tornado Source
- Gore's Message To Climate Change Skeptics
- Melting ice may not explain warming Arctic
- Major food source threatened by climate change
- Rising temperatures bring their own CO2
- Arctic Oscillation and Polar Vortices
- Ted Scambos, David Vaughn: West Antarctic -- Wilk...
- James Hansen: Rampant Negativity -- No Reason To B...
- Climate Progress: NASA's Hansen responds to the NY...
- Black carbon pollution emerges as major player in ...
- The Mystery of Global Warming's Missing Heat by Ri...
- Lester Brown: Plan B 3.0 -- Mobilizing to Save Civ...
- Effects of Climate Change on Antarctic Peninsula t...
- Climate Change? Been There, Done That -- a review ...
- Whatever The Warming, Ocean Acidifies From Carbon-...
- How the blurring of the seasons is a harbinger of ...
- Hansen et al.'s draft paper on target CO2 levels
- Thickest, Oldest Arctic Ice Is Melting: NASA data
- Arctic losing long-term ice cover
- Stratospheric Ozone Chemistry Plays An Important R...
- Gulf of Mexico's Dead Zone: Another Problem with ...
- Government Reports Warn Planners on Sea-Rise Threa...
- CO2 output must cease altogether, studies warn: R...
- World Food Program warning on soaring food prices,...
- George Monbiot: The Denial Industry
- Latest communique from James Hansen once again ref...
- NOAA: Study Shows Ocean “Deserts” are Expanding
- Stu Ostro: Update on Global Warming, Weather, and ...
- Exceptionally Warm Winter Temperatures at Barrow, ...
- James Lovelock: Enjoy Life While You Can
- Naomi Oreskes: The American Denial of Global Warming
-
▼
March
(39)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment