Blog Archive

Saturday, August 13, 2011

BOEMRE IG's witch hunting "special" agents double down with absurd notion that Alaska wildlife researcher, Charles Monnett, was somehow involved in a covert campaign to promote the issue of climate change, asked him about any connections he had to non-governmental organizations and fundraising for environmental groups

Readers, it is becoming more and more clear that the BOEMRE IG's so-called special agents are being guided by the global warming deniers' playbook. First, cast doubt on the research, then cast doubt on the scientist's integrity, then try to make it appear that taxpayer funds are being misspent, and top it all off by saying it is all part of a hidden agenda related to environmentalists, who as we all know are part of much larger worldwide conspiracy to promote communism and redistribute wealth. 

The fact that the Arctic has already warmed as much as 10-14 °F in some places, Arctic sea ice is on a rapidly declining death spiral and polar bears are logically having greater difficulty surviving - duh! - has nothing to do with it.

Because readers, oil companies want to drill up there without the ability to clean up spills.

I might add, that the severe lack of morals but also of any real intelligence of these oil people is astounding.

If they think images of polar bears swimming forlornly out in the middle of the Arctic Sea with no ice to rest on for over 60 miles is not disturbing, just wait until the world sees white polar bears covered in deathly black oil from the inevitable spills they have no means to clean up.  

Associated Press, August 9, 2011

The federal investigation into suspended wildlife biologist Charles Monnett has focused on the scientific merit of a 2006 article in which he and a colleague recorded their observations of apparently drowned polar bears in the Arctic, a watchdog group said Tuesday.

Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility said Monnett was interviewed by the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy, Management, Regulation and Enforcement's inspector general's office on Tuesday.

Monnett was suspended last month by the bureau pending results of an investigation into "integrity issues." The agency indicated that the suspension, which came amid an ongoing, months-long investigation, was related to how a polar bear research project was awarded and managed.

The article, published in 2006 in the journal Polar Biology, is based on observations that Monnett and fellow scientist Jeffrey Gleason made in 2004. At the time, they were conducting an aerial survey of bowhead whales, and saw four dead polar bears floating in the water after a storm. In the peer-reviewed article, they said they were reporting, to the best of their knowledge, the first observations of the bears floating dead and presumed drowned while apparently swimming long distances.

Polar bears are considered strong swimmers, they wrote, but long-distance swims may exact a greater metabolic toll than standing or walking on ice in better weather.

They said their observations suggested the bears drowned in rough seas and high winds. They also added that the findings "suggest that drowning-related deaths of polar bears may increase in the future if the observed trend of regression of pack ice and/or longer open water periods continues."

The article and related presentations helped make the polar bear a symbol for the global warming movement.

Separately Tuesday, U.S. Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., wrote the acting director of the Interior Department's inspector general's office, seeking clarification on the purpose of the investigation into Monnett.

Inhofe, the ranking member of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, said Monnett's work has been cited by witnesses before his committee and provided "the foundation" for the government's decision in 2008 to list the bear as a threatened species, the first with its survival at risk due to global warming.

"As a result, critical habitat for the polar bear was designated, which added additional layers of onerous regulations to oil and gas development in 187,000 square miles of land in Alaska," he said, adding that accusations against Monnett's work "could be serious and have far reaching consequences."

PEER executive director Jeff Ruch said that Tuesday's nearly three-hour long interview revolved around the article and the project, including Monnett's role during procurement.

Ruch, who monitored the interview via teleconference, said Monnett was also asked about any connections he had to non-governmental organizations and fundraising for environmental groups.

He said the suggestion was raised that Monnett was somehow involved in a covert campaign to promote the issue of climate change. Ruch said it could be several weeks before a transcript is available.

A bureau spokeswoman declined comment. Ruch said he is "mystified" that the inspector general's office "doesn't have better things to do."

Kassie Siegel, director of the Center for Biological Diversity's Climate Law Institute, said it's "absurd" to suggest that anything that's been said about the 2006 paper would have any bearing on the listing.

"That paper was one of literally hundreds of scientific articles cited in the listing," she said, adding that there was "nothing wrong" with the paper and that support for the protection of the polar bear in the scientific literature is "extraordinarily broad."

The center, which supported the listing, has joined Greenpeace in writing Interior Secretary Ken Salazar and the president's chief science adviser, John Holdren, seeking an inquiry into Monnett's suspension.

Read more:

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Weeks for a transcript???? Gotta count the words and the speed of the typist afterwards.