Over the next few days, we will be publishing a three-part series of posts outlining what an “All of the Above” energy strategy really means for the climate. This is Part I of the series.
In the opening of President Obama’s June 25th, 2013, remarks on climate change
at Georgetown University, he said to the younger audience members in
the crowd: “It was important for me to speak directly to your
generation, because the decisions that we make now and in the years
ahead will have a profound impact on the world that all of you inherit.”
The
President then went on to lay out a scary picture of a year’s worth of
climate-related impacts in the U.S. alone: “Here at home, 2012 was the
warmest year in our history. Midwest farms were parched by the worst
drought since the Dust Bowl, and then drenched by the wettest spring on
record. Western wildfires scorched an area larger than the state of
Maryland. Just last week, a heat wave in Alaska shot temperatures into
the 90s.”
And just days after the President’s speech, 19 elite firefighters were killed in an unusually erratic and hot wildfire in Arizona after a blistering and dry spring in the area.
Meanwhile, recent reports from scientific and financial
experts suggest that if we do not change the trajectory we are currently
on, our fossil fuel energy use is going to make the extreme weather we
see today seem tame. At the end of 2012, the International Energy Agency released an analysis concurring with previous reports from experts such as those at the Carbon Tracker Initiative who have suggested that a vast majority of the world’s proven reserves of fossil fuels must stay in the ground if we are to have any hope of maintaining a climate suitable for a healthy society.
Put another way, experts say we must leave at least 66%
(and likely even more) of the global reserves of fossil fuels in the
ground in order to have any chance for a safe climate in our future.
This is hard to swallow. We’ll be the first to admit it. We
are increasingly facing a reality that is scarier by the day to admit
exists. But it does. And in the face of this information, our leaders
are faced with a challenging dilemma.
There are those who accept the scary reality of climate
change and admit that we must make drastic changes to our energy system
in order to stabilize the climate. In accepting this reality, they face
down the efforts to corrupt our democracy and block progress by a fossil
fuel industry that has more money and political power than nearly any
entity on earth.
Others
simply pay lip service to the climate realities that are slapping them
in the face while avoiding making hard choices. They promote a so-called
“All of the Above” energy plan that includes more fracking, drilling,
and fossil fuel infrastructure, appeasing an industry that can help keep
them in office with their massive political spending. But more
importantly, they inappropriately downplay what the actual impacts of
climate change already are and what they will be in the future.
You could almost forgive those choosing the “All of the
Above” path for taking the easy road… except for the fact that the fate
of the planet is at stake.
It’s time to call it like it is: anyone who pushes an “All
of the Above” energy strategy that would dig up more than a third of our
current fossil fuel reserves is simply in denial about the realities of climate change.
Put simply, “All of the Above” energy proponents are the newest climate deniers.
You can’t say climate change is a problem and then turn
around and promote the very energy sources that are making it happen.
You can’t say the problem is urgent and then drag your feet in making
the necessary changes. You can’t be a climate champion and also an “All
of the Above” proponent.
This may sound harsh, but unfortunately the time has long
come for some tough love. We are digging our way to climate disaster,
and if we don’t stop digging we very well may get there.
In tomorrow’s post in this series, we’ll lay out
precisely how an “All of the Above” energy plan denies the realities of
climate change. Stay tuned.
No comments:
Post a Comment