Management of trade-offs in geoengineering through optimal choice of non-uniform radiative forcing
Douglas G. MacMartin, David W. Keith, Ben Kravitz and Ken Caldeira
Abstract
Solar radiation management could be used to offset some or all
anthropogenic radiative forcing, with the goal of reducing some of the
associated climatic change1, 2.
However, the degree of compensation will vary, with residual climate
changes larger in some regions than others. Similarly, the insolation
reduction that best compensates climate changes in one region may not be
the same as for another, leading to concerns about equity3.
Here we show that optimizing the latitudinal and seasonal distribution
of solar reduction can improve the fidelity with which solar radiation
management offsets anthropogenic climate change. Using the HadCM3L
general circulation model, we explore several trade-offs. First,
residual temperature and precipitation changes in the worst-off region
can be reduced by 30% relative to uniform solar
reduction, with only a modest impact on global root-mean-square changes;
this has implications for moderating regional inequalities. Second, the
same root-mean-square residual climate changes can be obtained with up
to 30% less insolation reduction, implying that
it may be possible to reduce solar radiation management side-effects and
risks (for example, ozone depletion if stratospheric sulphate aerosols
are used). Finally, allowing spatial and temporal variability increases
the range of trade-offs to be considered, raising the question of how to
weight different objectives.
http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate1722.html
Ken Caldeira is featured in the symposium Dana Wigington presents, noting that the geoengineering going on for years may "Ride on our grandchildren's future".
ReplyDeletehttp://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/arctic-death-spiral-and-the-methane-time-bomb/
Very true!
ReplyDelete