The large contribution of projected HFC emissions to future climate forcing
-
Edited by Mark H. Thiemens, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, and approved May 14, 2009 (received for review March 13, 2009)
Abstract
The consumption and emissions of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) are projected to increase substantially in the coming decades in response to regulation of ozone depleting gases under the Montreal Protocol. The projected increases result primarily from sustained growth in demand for refrigeration, air-conditioning (AC) and insulating foam products in developing countries assuming no new regulation of HFC consumption or emissions. New HFC scenarios are presented based on current hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HCFC) consumption in leading applications, patterns of replacements of HCFCs by HFCs in developed countries, and gross domestic product (GDP) growth. Global HFC emissions significantly exceed previous estimates after 2025 with developing country emissions as much as 800% greater than in developed countries in 2050. Global HFC emissions in 2050 are equivalent to 9–19% (CO2-eq. basis) of projected global CO2 emissions in business-as-usual scenarios and contribute a radiative forcing equivalent to that from 6–13 years of CO2 emissions near 2050. This percentage increases to 28–45% compared with projected CO2 emissions in a 450-ppm CO2 stabilization scenario. In a hypothetical scenario based on a global cap followed by 4% annual reductions in consumption, HFC radiative forcing is shown to peak and begin to decline before 2050.
Author contributions: G.J.M.V., D.W.F., J.S.D., M.M., and S.O.A. designed research; G.J.M.V. performed research; G.J.M.V. analyzed data; and G.J.M.V., D.W.F., J.S.D., M.M., and S.O.A. wrote the paper. This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0902817106/DCSupplemental.
-
↵* McFarland M (2008) Potential climate benefits of a global cap and reduction agreement for HFCs. Presentation at 20th meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol, Doha, Qatar.
-
Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.
"ensuring that facts and evidence are never twisted or obscured by politics or ideology."
ReplyDeleteI would like to stress the lack of seriousness in this study, although (or because ?) it was published by the PNAS.
2 examples : 1. the projected growth for HFCs would exhaust the total known world resources for Fluorspar (the basic material for producing HF and therefrom all fluorocarbons, including Teflon)
2. If it admitted that HFCs account for 20% of the total climate impact of refrigeration, which means that energy consumption accounts for the other 80 %.
Based on this ratio and in the AVERAGE scenario, running refrigeration systems would represent for the total HFCs consumption the equivalent of 8 Million T CO2 éq, and would require an energy consumption 5 times bigger i.e. 40 M tons CO2-éq, or as much as the TOTAL CO2 admitted by the stabilization scenario of 450 ppm CO2 in the atmosphere.